2010 Peugeot 308 1.6L Diesel · AY10 WDG

The 2010 Peugeot 308’s most recent MOT test on 2025-11-10 at 213,074 miles passed without defects, though it follows a failed test just 11 days earlier at 212,561 miles—an unusually short gap suggesting either a rushed or poorly managed inspection. The pattern of two consecutive failures in late 2025, both with no recorded defects, is highly irregular and warrants suspicion of either a test centre error or a vehicle that was driven through a test without addressing underlying issues. The preceding clean passes in 2024 and 2023 indicate no consistent mechanical trend, but the lack of advisories or defects in any test is unusual for a vehicle of this age and mileage, particularly given the high annual mileage. The most recent pass does not reflect a stable maintenance history but rather a series of abrupt test outcomes that demand further scrutiny. The recorded mileage of 213,074 miles over 16 years equates to an average of 13,317 miles annually, which is significantly higher than the typical UK average for a vehicle of this age. The most rapid accumulation appears between the 2024 and 2025 tests, where mileage jumped from 190,519 to 213,074 in just over a year—an increase of 22,555 miles. This suggests either intensive use or a period of neglect before the latest tests. The gap between the 2023 and 2024 tests (173,030 to 190,519 miles) is more moderate, but the overall trend indicates wear on high-mileage components. The lack of service records or advisories in the MOT history means critical maintenance intervals—such as suspension servicing, brake fluid changes, or drivetrain inspections—cannot be confirmed. Given the absence of defects in any test, the most pressing in-person inspections should focus on components commonly overlooked in high-mileage vehicles. The repeated failures in late 2025, despite no recorded issues, imply potential issues with brake binding, suspension wear, or exhaust emissions—areas where advisories are often omitted if not visibly severe. Inspect the rear brakes for uneven pad wear or binding calipers, as the test centre’s failure to flag these suggests either a superficial check or a vehicle that was driven through without proper diagnosis. The suspension should be examined for deteriorated bushes, coil springs, or excessive play in ball joints, particularly given the high mileage. Corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe is another critical area, as structural integrity degrades over time without visible MOT reporting. Finally, verify the condition of brake discs for excessive thickness variation or heat damage, as these are often only flagged when they fail the 18mm minimum thickness rule. The lack of advisories does not guarantee these components are sound—only that they passed the most basic MOT checks.