2010 Nissan Micra 1.5L Diesel · BD10 HGU

The Nissan Micra presents a clean MOT history with no recorded defects across all five tests, though the two consecutive fails in April 2024 and April 2025—both at identical mileages—demand closer scrutiny. The most recent pass in April 2025 at 96,801 miles suggests the vehicle met all roadworthiness standards at that point, but the repeated failures without defects imply administrative or procedural issues rather than mechanical ones. There’s no evidence of worsening trends in critical areas like brakes, suspension, or structural integrity, though the lack of advisories or defects leaves a gap in understanding how minor wear items (such as tyres, wiper blades, or bulbs) were managed. The absence of corrosion-related failures also points to either effective rust treatment or a model less prone to severe corrosion, though this cannot be confirmed without a physical inspection. The mileage progression is steady and typical for a 16-year-old vehicle, averaging around 6,050 miles per year—a rate that aligns with moderate use without excessive wear. The gaps between tests are consistent, with each MOT falling roughly 12 months apart, suggesting the car was either stored for extended periods or driven lightly. There’s no sign of rapid mileage accumulation that might indicate neglect or heavy usage, which would typically accelerate wear on components like clutch, brakes, or suspension. However, the identical mileage figures for the two failed tests in 2024 and 2025 (93,735 and 96,801 miles respectively) raise a question: was the vehicle not driven between tests, or did the owner delay retesting after a failure? This inconsistency, while not mechanically damaging, could hint at inconsistent ownership or maintenance routines. For a buyer, the primary focus should be on consumable items not covered by the MOT, such as tyre tread depth, brake pad thickness, and suspension bush wear—particularly the rear bushes, which are common failure points in Micras of this age. Given the lack of recorded defects, structural corrosion in wheel arches, sills, or subframes should still be checked, as MOT testers may overlook early-stage rust in less accessible areas. The brakes, while not flagged, warrant a closer look: binding calipers or uneven disc wear could have been missed in tests where no defects were logged. Finally, the exhaust system and emissions components should be inspected for leaks or excessive backpressure, as these are often overlooked in clean MOT histories but can indicate deeper mechanical neglect.