2018 Volkswagen Polo 1.4L Diesel · CA67 VNP

The Volkswagen Polo’s most recent MOT test on 2025-10-07—just nine months ago—shows a clean pass with no defects recorded, despite the vehicle failing the same test on the same day. This duplication suggests either an administrative error or an unusually thorough inspection process, but it confirms the car passed all mandatory checks at 102,146 miles. The previous clean pass in December 2024 at 87,667 miles indicates no recurring faults were reported over the past year, though the absence of advisories or defects makes it impossible to confirm whether minor wear items (such as brake pads or suspension bushes) were replaced proactively. The trend appears stable, with no evidence of worsening mechanical issues, but the lack of advisories also means there’s no transparency on whether routine maintenance was consistently performed. The recorded mileage of 102,146 miles over eight years—roughly 12,768 miles annually—is significantly higher than the average for a vehicle of this age, suggesting frequent use. The gap between tests is consistent, with roughly 14,000 miles between each MOT, but there’s no indication of extended periods of disuse or low-mileage storage. The most notable pattern is the rapid accumulation of miles, which could imply higher wear on components like tyres, brakes, and suspension over time. The absence of earlier MOT records means there’s no historical context for how the vehicle’s condition has evolved beyond the past three tests. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear items that aren’t always flagged in standard tests. Focus on the brakes—particularly rear calipers and discs—for binding or uneven wear, as this isn’t captured in pass/fail results. The suspension should be checked for worn or leaking bushes, as well as coil spring integrity, especially given the mileage. Tyres, though not recorded in failures, may show uneven tread or suboptimal tread depth, given the high mileage. Finally, inspect for corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as structural integrity isn’t always visible without a thorough examination. The lack of advisories in recent tests makes it impossible to confirm whether these areas have been addressed.