2015 Suzuki Celerio 1.0L Petrol · CE65 MXF

The 2015 Suzuki Celerio currently holds a valid MOT that ran from February 2026, passing on the second attempt at 129,249 miles. The maintenance trend is broadly stable but punctuated by recurring minor electrical and cosmetic faults rather than escalating mechanical deterioration. The February 2026 failure flagged a non-functioning nearside front position lamp, incorrect headlamp aim, pitted front brake discs, and a sharp-edged temporary bumper repair. All of these were rectified before the pass six days later, suggesting responsive rather than neglectful ownership. The car has not presented any major structural or safety-critical failures in recent years, which is a positive indicator for a vehicle of this age and mileage. The mileage progression tells a coherent story. Between February 2024 at 106,465 miles and February 2025 at 115,474 miles, the car covered roughly 9,000 miles in twelve months. That then accelerated to approximately 13,775 miles in the following year leading to February 2026. The current total of 129,249 miles aligns with an annualised average of around 11,750 miles, which is typical for a small urban hatchback. There are no suspicious gaps or implausible jumps in the record, and the annual testing pattern has been consistent since at least 2024. The data is clean and regular, with no suggestion of long periods standing or mileage rollback. Buyers should still approach the front braking system with scrutiny. The pitted front brake discs appeared as an advisory in the February 2026 test, meaning they were worn but not yet at the point of mandatory replacement. At nearly 130,000 miles, the discs and pads are likely approaching the end of their service life, and any juddering or pulsing through the pedal under braking would confirm that replacement is overdue. The temporary nearside front bumper repair noted in the failed test also warrants close inspection. A sharp-edged temporary fix suggests a minor impact that may have been bodged rather than professionally repaired, so check behind the bumper for cracked mounting points or misaligned trim. The repeated headlamp aim and lamp failures point to nothing more than basic electrical maintenance being overlooked between tests, but verify that all exterior lamps function correctly on every circuit, including the stop lamp that failed in February 2025. Beyond the recorded advisories, a physical inspection should focus on the front suspension and subframe given the mileage. Eleven years and nearly 130,000 miles of urban use will have tested bushes, drop links, and coil springs, so listen for clunks over speed bumps and check for uneven tyre wear. The exhaust system and its mountings deserve attention too, as heat cycling and road salt can cause corrosion well before it becomes an MOT failure. Overall, the record reflects a car that has been kept on the road without major incident, but one where consumable items and minor defects have been addressed reactively rather than proactively.