2015 Ford C-MAX 1.6L Diesel · EY15 SPZ

The most recent MOT tests for this 2015 Ford C-Max, conducted on 25 September 2025 at 97,112 miles , reveal a concerning pattern of two consecutive failures despite no recorded defects being listed. This suggests either a systematic oversight in the testing process —unlikely—or that the vehicle passed a pre-MOT inspection but failed on-site for issues not captured in the official record. The lack of defects in prior tests (2023 and 2022) implies no consistent mechanical failures, but the recent double failure warrants scrutiny, particularly if the tester flagged minor but critical items (e.g., binding brakes, excessive play in suspension, or failing emissions) that were not documented. The 18-month gap between tests (2023–2025) also raises questions about whether the vehicle was driven regularly or sat idle, potentially accelerating wear on fluids, tyres, or corrosion-prone areas. The recorded mileage of 97,112 miles over 11 years averages 8,828 miles annually , which is typical for a vehicle of this age. However, the two-year span between 81,585 and 92,326 miles (2022–2023) suggests a period of lower usage , possibly indicating storage or reduced mileage during that interval. The subsequent 9,786 miles in just over a year (2023–2025) implies recent active use, which could accelerate wear on brake pads, suspension bushes, and coil springs if maintenance was deferred. The absence of mileage gaps beyond this makes it unlikely the vehicle was neglected for extended periods, but the sudden increase in mileage before the latest tests could correlate with the failure if critical components were overlooked. Given the double failure in 2025 , a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the braking system , particularly for binding calipers, warped discs, or worn-out pads , as these are common causes of MOT failures. The suspension —especially rear bushes and coil springs—should be checked for excessive wear or corrosion , as these often fail silently until they cause handling issues or MOT rejections. Exhaust emissions were not noted in failures, but a smoke test or emissions scan is advisable given the vehicle’s age. Structural corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe should be inspected, as this is a silent risk that can compromise safety. The tyre tread depth and sidewall integrity must also be verified, as the double failure could imply prior tread-related issues were missed. Finally, fluid levels (brake, power steering, coolant) and fluid condition should be assessed, as prolonged storage or irregular use can degrade them.