Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid

2013 Volvo XC60 2.4L Diesel · FH13 NGF

FH13 NGF

2013 Volvo XC60 (2.4L, diesel). First registered 01/08/2013. Recorded mileage 112,288 miles. MOT valid until 05/08/2027. Taxed until 01/01/2027.

Make & Model
VOLVO XC60
Year / Origin
2013 · Nottingham
MOT Status
Valid until 05/08/2027
Road Tax
Taxed (01/01/2027)
Recorded Mileage
112,288 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Non-Compliant (Pre-Euro 6 Diesel)
Fuel & Engine
DIESEL · 2.4L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 05/08/2027
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/01/2027
Fuel Type
DIESEL
Year
2013
Engine
2400cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The most recent MOT inspection on 30 July 2026 resulted in a pass, though the vehicle required a failure on the preceding day due to non-functional front position lamps. While the vehicle is currently legal, the maintenance trend shows signs of emerging wear in specific mechanical areas rather than a decline in overall care. The transition from a clean 2023 record to more frequent advisories in 2025 and 2026 suggests that the vehicle is entering a phase of life where rubber components and consumables require more proactive attention. The recurring mention of windscreen damage and registration plate deterioration indicates minor cosmetic neglect, but the more significant mechanical advisories regarding suspension and tyres warrant closer scrutiny. With 112,288 miles recorded over approximately thirteen years, this Volvo XC60 has averaged roughly 8,638 miles per year. This represents typical, moderate usage for a diesel or petrol SUV of this age, suggesting the vehicle has not been subjected to extreme high-speed motorway transit nor has it suffered from the detrimental effects of excessive long-term standing. This mileage profile is generally favourable as it implies the engine and drivetrain have been used regularly enough to prevent internal sludge build-up or excessive seal drying, yet the total distance is high enough that major service items like timing belts, water pumps, and suspension bushings are likely approaching or have already exceeded their service life. A primary concern for a prospective buyer is the recent advisory regarding worn lower suspension arm pins or bushes on both the nearside and offside front. This is a common wear point on heavier vehicles like the XC60. During a test drive, you should listen intently for knocking, clunking, or creaking sounds when driving over speed bumps or uneven road surfaces, particularly when turning the steering wheel at low speeds. Worn bushes can also lead to imprecise steering feel or a slight wander in the vehicle's tracking. Furthermore, the history of tyres being worn close to the legal limit or having cuts suggests that the owner may be running consumables to the limit of their safety margin. You should inspect all four tyres for uneven tread wear, which could indicate alignment issues resulting from the aforementioned suspension wear, and check the sidewalls for any signs of perishing or bulges. Regarding the braking system, the 2022 advisories for worn rear discs and thin pads indicate that the rear braking components have a history of reaching the end of their service life. While these may have been addressed, you should check for any pulsation through the brake pedal or shuddering under heavy braking, which could signal warped discs or sticking calipers. Given the vehicle's age and moderate mileage, it is also essential to verify the service history for fluid changes, specifically brake fluid and coolant, which degrade over time regardless of mileage. Finally, check the condition of the engine undertrays mentioned in previous tests to ensure they are securely fastened, as they play a vital role in protecting the engine and preventing debris from causing damage to lower components.

FH13 NGF Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 30/07/2026
  • 112,288 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • 4 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring tyres items (4 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
85
/ 100 · Good
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Good

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for FH13NGF

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

FH13 NGF Mileage History

  1. 01/08/202398,981 mi
  2. 29/07/2024105,496 mi+6,515 mi
  3. 31/07/2025108,696 mi+3,200 mi
  4. 29/07/2026112,287 mi+3,591 mi
  5. 30/07/2026112,288 mi+1 mi

Average of roughly 4,443 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

FH13 NGF MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 2 Sept 2026, 14:05
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2013 Volvo Xc60 (FH13 NGF) between August 2023 and July 2026.

The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 30 July 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Tyres (4 issues), Suspension (4 issues), Windscreen (3 issues), Lighting (2 issues). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 10 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))”; “Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY

Buyer's Guide & Inspection Advisory

Expert automotive synthesis from historical MOT defect records and market benchmarks.

Buying Score
54/100
Risk Level
Medium
Medium
Est. Annual Cost
£2,200-£2,800
Mileage
At 112,288 miles over 13 years, this XC6...

Our Verdict

This 2013 Volvo XC60 diesel has a relati

At 112,288 miles over a 13-year life, this XC60 is well into high-mileage territory, so a thorough mechanical inspection by a Volvo specialist (or independent with D5 diesel experience) is essential. The 2.4-litre D5 diesel is generally robust but at this mileage expect attention to the timing belt (if not recently replaced), dual-mass flywheel, and turbo actuator. Ask for documentary evidence of the timing belt change interval as this is a service-interval critical item on these engines.

The MOT history shows repeat advisories for front suspension arm pins/bushes on both nearside and offside, suggesting the front lower suspension arms are likely due for replacement. Budget around £400-£600 for a pair of front suspension arms fitted. The 2025 test also flagged multiple tyres worn close to the legal limit, indicating the vehicle may be hard on rubber — factor in a full set of tyres (£400-£600) if the current ones are close to the limit.

The fail in July 2026 was triggered by two non-functioning front position lamps (a minor defect, likely a blown bulb or bulb holder issue) alongside the suspension and plate advisories. This was clearly a quick fix as the vehicle passed the next day. However, a fail followed immediately by a pass is a pattern worth noting — it suggests the vehicle was being prepared for sale. Insist on seeing the original test failure sheet and the rectification evidence.

The 2.4 D5 diesel XC60 typically returns 35-45 mpg in real-world mixed driving, though high-mileage examples like this one (averaging around 8,800 miles per year, very close to the model average of 8,945) may see figures towards the lower end. Road tax sits in a higher bracket for this engine size and age — expect around £200-£300 annually depending on exact emissions band. Insurance for a 2013 XC60 diesel is typically group 30-34, so premiums of £500-£800 are realistic for an average driver.

Maintenance costs for the XC60 are higher than mainstream brands; routine servicing at a specialist runs £200-£350 depending on whether it's an interim or full service, and major items like a timing belt change can cost £700-£1,000. The D5 engine is known for injector and EGR valve issues at higher mileages, so budget for potential £400-£800 in diesel-specific repairs over the next 12 months. Combined estimated annual running cost: £2,200-£2,800.

Priority one is the front suspension: the 2026 MOT flagged worn suspension arm pins/bushes on both sides, and given these have appeared as advisories, the bushes are likely deteriorating beyond acceptable limits. Jack the car up and check for play in the front lower arms by hand, and look for perished or cracked bush rubber. Also inspect the rear suspension for any sagging or knocking, as the XC60 is known for rear coil spring failure (which is the top MOT failure reason for this model according to aggregate data).

Inspect all four tyres for tread depth and even wear — the 2025 test flagged three tyres worn close to the legal limit, so uneven wear patterns could indicate alignment or suspension geometry issues. Check the windscreen carefully for the damage noted on three consecutive tests; while it has passed as not adversely affecting the driver's view, growing cracks could become a failure at the next test.

For the 2.4 D5 diesel specifically, check for excessive smoke on startup (indicating worn turbo seals or valve stem seals), listen for knocking from the dual-mass flywheel when releasing the clutch from rest, and inspect the EGR valve and intake for carbon build-up. The oil filler cap and underside should be checked for leaks, and a coolant level check will reveal any head gasket concerns. Finally, verify the timing belt replacement interval — these engines are interference-type, so a snapped belt can cause catastrophic engine damage.

First registered in August 2013, this black XC60 is powered by a 2.4-litre diesel engine and has covered 112,288 miles as of the most recent test in July 2026. Across four recorded MOT tests since 2023, the vehicle has passed on three occasions, with one fail in July 2026 that was immediately followed by a pass the following day. Advisories on front suspension arm pins/bushes, tyre condition, and windscreen damage appear across multiple tests, pointing to a pattern of wear items that buyers should inspect in person.

The Volvo XC60 has an MOT pass rate of 84.6% across 94,049 analysed vehicles, placing it broadly in line with family SUV averages. The top failure reason is coil spring, which is a known weak point on the rear suspension of this generation.

Reviewed by the IsItAGoodCar editorial team — Verified automotive analysis synthesized from official vehicle registries.

Data Sources

DVSA

Official MOT test logs & failure reasons

DVLA

Tax, registration & powertrain specs

Experian

Finance, stolen markers & total loss

AI Analysis

Historical fault & advisory patterns