2006 Ford Fiesta 2.0L Petrol · GF06 KGA

This 2006 Ford Fiesta has demonstrated a concerning pattern of MOT failures over the past two years, with the most recent test on 6 May 2025 at 154,646 miles resulting in a fail despite no recorded defects. The absence of specific fault codes in any of the five tests suggests either a lack of transparency in the MOT process or that the vehicle’s condition was borderline across multiple areas, yet not severe enough to trigger a defect. The repeated failures—particularly the back-to-back tests in March 2024 at 147,213 and 147,217 miles—indicate a failure to address underlying issues before retesting. While the vehicle technically passed in February 2023, the subsequent failures imply a deterioration in reliability or maintenance neglect, especially given the age and mileage. The recorded mileage of 154,646 miles over 20 years reflects a steady average of approximately 7,732 miles per year, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps or spikes in mileage accumulation, though the lack of pre-MOT maintenance records means it’s impossible to confirm whether the vehicle was serviced regularly or if the failures were due to deferred repairs. The most notable anomaly is the repeated testing in March 2024, where the vehicle failed twice within days, suggesting either a rushed attempt to pass without addressing faults or a test centre’s inability to identify issues clearly. Without service history, the wear on high-mileage components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers cannot be reliably assessed from the MOT data alone. Given the repeated MOT failures without specific defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle, as binding brakes or worn suspension components are common causes of borderline MOT failures in this model. The lack of recorded defects does not preclude structural corrosion—check the wheel arches, sills, and subframe for rust penetration, as this is a critical failure risk in a vehicle of this age. Brake discs and pads should be measured for uneven wear, and the tester should verify there is no excessive play in the steering or suspension, which could indicate worn joints or deteriorated bushes. The absence of emissions-related defects does not rule out catalytic converter issues, so a scan for fault codes would be advisable. Finally, the engine bay should be inspected for oil leaks, as these often go unnoticed until they compromise structural integrity.