2009 Hyundai I20 1.2L Petrol · GF59 OJC

The vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the maintenance trend indicates a pattern of reactive repairs regarding secondary components. In the most recent test in April 2025 at 120,712 miles, the car passed after an initial failure involving an ineffective windscreen wiper and oil weeping on the nearside front shock absorber. While the wiper was rectified, the ongoing presence of shock absorber leaks suggests that the previous owner only addresses faults once they Compliance an MOT failure, rather than performing preventative maintenance. At 120,712 miles, the vehicle has averaged approximately 7,100 miles per year since its 2009 registration, which is consistent with typical light annual usage. TheData shows steady progression between tests, with roughly 3,600 miles covered between February 2023 and April 2024, and another 6,640 miles covered in the final year. This consistent mileage profile suggests a regular use, though the age of the vehicle places significant stress on rubber-based components and corrosion-related areas. A buyer must specifically inspect the braking system and suspension, as these areas have shown recurring issues. The rear parking brake and service brake imbalance have been flagged as "just met" or failing since 2023, indicating that the mechanism is seizing or the hydraulic cylinders are at the limit of their adjustment range. Furthermore, the offside rear shock absorber has been noted for misting since 2023, with the nearside front unit now appearing in 2025. This persistent weeping suggests the dampers are nearing failure and will soon require replacement. Structural integrity requires close attention due to the 2024 advisory regarding a corroded suspension component that was not yet seriously weakened. Given the vehicle's age and the history of worn Macpherson strut bushes noted in early 2023, the undercarriage should be checked for signs of advanced rust. The buyer should also verify that the parking brake provides a firm, secure hold, as the history shows this is a recurring weak point for this specific example.