2013 KIA RIO 1.2L Petrol · GU13 XNP

The 2013 KIA RIO presents a clean bill of health on its most recent MOT, having passed on 5 February 2026 at 65,993 miles with zero defects recorded. This is a strong indicator of current roadworthiness. The maintenance trend is clearly improving. The 2025 test cycle was notably messy, with a failure on 1 February 2025 for a blown rear registration plate lamp, perished tyres, worn front brake discs, and a deteriorated nearside front lower suspension arm ball joint dust cover, followed by a pass on the same date after rectification. Since then, the vehicle has sailed through two consecutive clean passes, suggesting the previous owner addressed the flagged issues promptly rather than ignoring them. The mileage profile tells an interesting story. At roughly 5,076 miles per year, this is a low-mileage vehicle for its age. The record shows a jump of 4,562 miles between the February 2024 test at 58,832 miles and the February 2025 test at 63,394 miles, then a modest 2,599 miles added in the following twelve months to reach 65,993 miles by February 2026. The mileage accumulation is consistent and believable, with no suspicious gaps or sudden spikes that would raise concerns about clocking or long periods of inactivity causing seizure of components. The 2025 advisories and failures point to a vehicle that had a period of neglect around the 63,000-mile mark, specifically regarding tyre condition and front brake disc wear. All four tyres showed cracking or perishing, which on a low-mileage car often indicates age degradation rather than heavy use, likely from prolonged standing or poor storage conditions. The front brake discs were lipped but within tolerance, a normal wear pattern, while the nearside front lower ball joint dust cover deterioration is worth monitoring since a failed cover accelerates joint wear and can lead to costly suspension repair. A buyer should inspect the underside for corrosion given the vehicle's age, check the condition of all tyre sidewalls for further perishing, and verify the nearside front ball joint for play. The rear brakes received no mention in any test, so their condition should be confirmed independently. Overall, the record suggests a car that was neglected briefly but has since been brought back to a well-maintained standard.