2010 Nissan Note 1.6L Petrol · GY60 CFO

This Nissan Note’s most recent MOT, conducted just over a year ago on 2025-06-26, reflects a stable but inconsistent maintenance pattern. The vehicle passed the test at 47,156 miles, yet the same date shows a duplicate entry—one marked as failed—with no recorded defects. This duplication suggests either an administrative error or a test rerun, but neither reveals mechanical issues. The preceding annual tests in 2024 and 2023 also passed without failings, indicating no recurring faults were detected by the tester. However, the lack of advisories or defects across all entries means no critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers were flagged during these inspections. That said, the absence of advisories does not preclude hidden wear, particularly in areas like rear brake binding or corrosion, which often go undetected in basic MOT checks. The recorded mileage of 47,156 miles over 16 years—roughly 2,947 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either minimal use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gaps between tests are consistent, with roughly 2,500 miles logged between each annual MOT, yet the lack of intermediate maintenance records raises questions about whether basic upkeep—such as tyre rotations, brake fluid flushes, or suspension checks—was performed. The absence of higher mileage spikes also implies the vehicle has not been subjected to heavy or frequent driving, which could mask accelerated wear in components like the drivetrain or exhaust system. Given the sparse MOT history and the vehicle’s age, a prospective buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection focusing on high-wear areas that aren’t routinely tested. The suspension, particularly rear bushes and coil springs, should be examined for excessive play or corrosion, as these are common failure points in older Nissan Notes. Brake discs and calipers warrant close scrutiny, especially the rear, where binding or uneven wear could indicate neglect. Structural integrity, particularly around wheel arches and sills, should be checked for corrosion, as this is often a silent risk in low-mileage but aged vehicles. Finally, the exhaust system’s integrity—including for leaks or rust—should be verified, as this is another area prone to hidden deterioration. The lack of advisories in the MOT history does not guarantee these components are sound, but it does suggest no overt failures were present at the time of testing.