2010 Toyota Aygo 1.0L Petrol · KX60 NHV

A pattern of escalating exhaust and corrosion issues defines the mechanical outlook for this 2010 Toyota Aygo, with the most recent test on 22 July 2026 recording a pass alongside tyre and wiper advisories that point to front axle attention being required. The trend across the 2024 and 2026 tests is one of deterioration rather than improvement. In September 2024 the vehicle failed on emissions and presented advisories covering exhaust corrosion with a minor gas leak, front subframe surface corrosion, and worn nearside front anti-roll bar linkage and suspension arm pin or bush. By July 2026 the exhaust had progressed from a minor leak to a major leak of exhaust gases at the rear, accompanied by a failure to complete emissions testing due to exhaust condition and a non-functioning offside headlamp dipped beam. The same front tyre wear pattern was flagged at both the failed and subsequent pass, indicating a persistent or unrectified issue. Overall, the corrosion and exhaust deterioration trajectory is concerning for a 16 year old vehicle and warrants close physical inspection before purchase. With approximately 117,687 miles recorded over 16 years, the Aygo averages around 7,355 miles annually, which is broadly consistent with typical usage for a vehicle of this age and segment. The MOT history shows no multi-year testing gaps, indicating continuous road use rather than prolonged off-road storage, which is positive for component circulation and general mechanical health. There is no evidence in the records of rapid mileage accumulation between tests, suggesting a steady rather than intensive driving pattern. This usage profile means wear should be broadly proportional to mileage rather than compounded by extended standing periods, though the recorded advisories indicate that age related corrosion has nonetheless taken hold on critical underbody components. The front subframe corrosion advisory from September 2024 is the most significant structural item to investigate physically. Surface corrosion that is not seriously weakened can progress to a failure category within one or two test cycles, particularly in salt-exposed areas, so the underside should be examined closely for any flaking, pitting, or distortion around the subframe mounting points and suspension pick-ups. The nearside front anti-roll bar linkage and suspension arm pin or bush wear advisories point to deteriorating front suspension joints, and during a test drive any knocking or clonking noises over uneven surfaces, vague steering response, or uneven tyre wear across the front axle would suggest these bushes have moved beyond advisory tolerance and require replacement. Uneven or feathered inner or outer edges on the tyres would also corroborate worn suspension geometry. The exhaust system has been the most pressing mechanical concern, having escalated from a minor leak in 2024 to a major leak of exhaust gases by mid-2026. This progression typically indicates corrosion perforation at the rear joint or silencer box, and a physical inspection underneath should look for soot staining around joints, hangers, and the rear silencer body. The headlamp failure for offside dipped beam in the failed test may simply indicate a blown bulb or failed connector, but on a vehicle of this age wiring corrosion within the headlamp connector is common and should be checked. The tyres flagged as worn close to legal limit on both nearside and offside front positions at consecutive tests suggest tracking misalignment, possibly linked to the worn suspension components, and a fresh set of tyres fitted post-test should be monitored for uneven wear. Finally, on the road listen for any exhaust ticking or blowing under load, particularly on overrun, and feel for any steering pull or vibration through the front end which would confirm the suspension components require immediate attention.