2008 Hyundai I10 1.1L Petrol · LL08 DWZ

This Hyundai i10 has demonstrated a clear worsening trend in maintenance standards over the past two years, culminating in a recent failure on 1 December 2025. The most recent test, just five months ago, revealed critical failures in the offside front CV joint boot, all four tyres at or beyond legal limits, and rear brake pads dangerously thin—indicating a vehicle that has been driven despite known mechanical and safety risks. The pattern of repeated tyre and boot failures suggests either neglectful servicing or a lack of owner awareness, while the rear brake pads’ thickness at 1.5mm or less in November 2024 implies a failure to address advisory warnings from the prior test. The recorded mileage of 38,127 miles over nearly 18 years reflects an exceptionally low annual average of just 2,118 miles, which may point to prolonged periods of inactivity rather than light usage. Notably, there is a 12-month gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests, with no intermediate mileage data to confirm whether the vehicle was driven at all during that period. The absence of any significant mileage accumulation between tests—despite the car’s age—raises questions about whether the vehicle was stored or used sporadically, potentially accelerating wear from moisture and corrosion rather than wear from motion. A buyer should prioritise an immediate inspection of the front CV joints, particularly the offside unit, where the boot has repeatedly failed and now appears split or insecure. The rear brake system warrants thorough examination, including pad thickness, disc condition, and caliper binding, as the 2024 advisory on pads was not addressed before the subsequent failure. All four tyres show evidence of edge wear, cracking, and damage, suggesting they may have been fitted without proper alignment or replaced without balancing. Structural components such as suspension bushes, coil springs, and wheel arches should be checked for corrosion, as prolonged inactivity can exacerbate rust development in critical areas. The battery’s history of insecurity also demands verification, as an insecure mount poses an immediate safety hazard.