Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid

2005 Mercedes CLK 3.2L Gas bi-fuel · LM54 FPZ

LM54 FPZ

2005 Mercedes CLK (3.2L, gas bi-fuel). First registered 01/02/2005. Recorded mileage 100,214 miles. MOT valid until 09/11/2026. Taxed until 01/08/2026.

Make & Model
MERCEDES CLK
Year / Origin
2005 · Wimbledon (South London)
MOT Status
Valid until 09/11/2026
Road Tax
Taxed (01/08/2026)
Recorded Mileage
100,214 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required
Fuel & Engine
GAS BI-FUEL · 3.2L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 09/11/2026
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/08/2026
Fuel Type
GAS BI-FUEL
Year
2005
Engine
3199cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The 2005 Mercedes CLK is currently roadworthy following its most recent MOT test on 2025-11-10, where it passed with only one minor defect: a severely deteriorated dust cover on the nearside front lower suspension arm ball joint. However, the maintenance trend shows a concerning worsening pattern, particularly in the suspension and lighting systems. The same vehicle failed the previous MOT on the same day due to multiple issues, including headlamp aim problems and the same deteriorated ball joint cover, indicating unresolved or recurring faults. The vehicle has accumulated 100,214 miles over 21 years, averaging approximately 4,772 miles per year, which is relatively low for its age. This suggests the car has likely seen light use or periods of inactivity, potentially preserving mechanical components but possibly contributing to issues like seized suspension joints or corrosion in damp areas. The MOT history reveals a significant gap between the 2023-09-27 failure and the 2024-09-24 pass, during which the nearside front coil spring fractured and the offside lower arm ball joint became excessively worn. The 2025-11-10 test shows the same ball joint issue persisting, now with a deteriorated dust cover, indicating ongoing neglect or insufficient repair. Buyers should conduct a thorough in-person inspection focusing on the front suspension components, particularly the nearside lower arm ball joint and coil springs, as these have been repeatedly flagged. The deteriorated dust cover is a symptom of a potentially failing joint, which could lead to sudden failure if not addressed. Additionally, the recurring headlamp aim issues suggest possible alignment problems or damage to the reflectors, which may affect nighttime visibility. The corrosion on the offside front coil spring also indicates potential structural weakness in the suspension system, warranting close examination of the entire front suspension assembly for wear, rust, or binding components.

LM54 FPZ Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 10/11/2025
  • 100,214 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 1 defect noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring lighting items (6 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
75
/ 100 · Good
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Good

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for LM54FPZ

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

LM54 FPZ Mileage History

  1. 27/09/202385,220 mi
  2. 28/09/202385,220 mi
  3. 24/09/202492,445 mi+7,225 mi
  4. 10/11/2025100,214 mi+7,769 mi
  5. 10/11/2025100,214 mi

Average of roughly 7,066 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

LM54 FPZ MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 15 Jun 2026, 23:50
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2005 Mercedes Clk (LM54 FPZ) between September 2023 and November 2025.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 10 November 2025 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Lighting (6 issues), Suspension (5 issues). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 1 advisory notice is recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))”; “Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))”; “Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY