2006 Renault Kangoo 1.5L Diesel · LS06 AHD

This Renault Kangoo’s most recent MOT test on 2022-11-28—just 3 years and 8 months ago—shows a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite identical mileage readings (94,203 miles) on both attempts. The lack of recorded defects in either test suggests the failures were procedural rather than mechanical, but the double attempt indicates unresolved issues that likely required attention beyond the MOT’s scope. Given the vehicle’s age and the absence of any advisories or defects in prior tests, the trend is stable in terms of passing rates but raises questions about whether critical components were overlooked or if the vehicle was driven between tests without proper servicing. The recorded mileage of 94,203 miles over nearly 20 years—roughly 4,710 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, implying either minimal use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the 2021 and 2022 tests (just one day apart in December 2021, followed by another in November 2022) suggests the vehicle was not driven between those dates, which could accelerate wear on fluids, seals, and suspension components. Without intermediate service records, it’s impossible to confirm whether routine maintenance was performed, but the low mileage pattern may indicate deferred upkeep rather than consistent, low-mileage operation. Given the repeated MOT failures and the vehicle’s age, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system—particularly the bushes, coil springs, and shock absorbers—for excessive wear or corrosion, as these are common failure points in older vans. The brakes, including calipers, pads, and discs, should be checked for uneven wear or binding, especially if the vehicle was left stationary for extended periods, as this can lead to corrosion or seized components. Structural integrity, particularly around the wheel arches, sills, and underbody, should also be examined for rust penetration, as this is a critical failure risk in a vehicle of this vintage. The absence of advisories in the MOT history does not guarantee these areas are sound, but it does indicate no prior tester flagged obvious concerns.