2004 Honda CR-V 2.0L Petrol · LS54 SCV

This 2004 Honda CR-V last passed its MOT on 3 May 2022 at 143,612 miles, with no defects recorded. The absence of advisories or failures in that test suggests the vehicle met the minimum roadworthiness standards at the time, though the lack of recent testing—nearly four years overdue—introduces uncertainty. Without subsequent MOTs, there is no evidence of recurring issues or proactive maintenance since May 2022, leaving critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers unconfirmed for wear or failure. The tester’s silence on emissions or structural integrity in 2022 does not imply these areas are sound; rather, it reflects the test’s pass/fail threshold rather than a full diagnostic assessment. The recorded mileage of 143,612 miles over 22 years averages roughly 6,500 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no intermediate mileage markers or MOTs to assess wear patterns, but the steady accumulation suggests consistent use rather than neglect or prolonged storage. The gap between tests—nearly 48 months—is unusual for a vehicle in active service, as most owners opt for annual or biennial checks to monitor consumables like tyres, brakes, and fluids. Without intervening maintenance records, potential buyers cannot verify whether routine services were performed, which could affect drivetrain longevity or fuel efficiency. Given the sparse MOT history, an in-person inspection should prioritise high-wear areas that often fail silently. The suspension—particularly rear bushes and coil springs—will require close examination for excessive play, cracking, or corrosion, as these components degrade predictably over 22 years and 140,000 miles. Brake discs and calipers should be checked for uneven wear or binding, while the exhaust system must be inspected for leaks or rust-through, especially around joints and underbody sections. Tyre tread depth and sidewall integrity are critical; failing twice on tread in prior tests (if any existed) would indicate basic upkeep was overlooked. Finally, the subframe and wheel arches should be scrutinised for structural corrosion, as this is a common failure point in older CR-Vs exposed to UK road conditions.