2010 Lexus IS250 2.5L Petrol · LT60 WBF

The Lexus IS250’s most recent MOT tests reveal a concerning pattern of instability rather than consistent roadworthiness. The vehicle passed on 26 September 2025 yet simultaneously failed on the same day at the same mileage (86,705), a duplication that suggests either an administrative error or, more critically, a last-minute attempt to pass without addressing underlying issues. The prior test cycle in 2024 showed no defects at 64,676 miles, followed by another clean pass in 2023 at 60,558 miles—though that year also included a duplicate fail date, implying a similar oversight or unresolved problems. The lack of recorded defects in passing tests does not negate the risk of hidden failures, particularly if the vehicle was driven between tests without maintenance. The recorded mileage of 86,705 miles over 16 years equates to approximately 5,400 miles annually, a figure that is unusually low for a vehicle of this age and model. The gap between the 2023 and 2024 tests spans 15,118 miles in just over a year, suggesting either prolonged storage or very light use. The absence of intermediate MOTs or service records means there is no evidence of regular servicing or wear monitoring during this period. Such low mileage could mask deeper issues, as components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers may degrade slowly over time without significant stress, yet still fail catastrophically when finally driven hard. Given the duplicate fail dates and the lack of specific defect details, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of critical high-wear areas that often fail without warning. Focus on the suspension system—particularly the rear subframe mounts and bushings—for signs of cracking or excessive play, as Lexus IS250 models are prone to bush deterioration over time. The braking system warrants thorough examination, including rear caliper binding (a common issue in this model) and front-to-rear pad thickness consistency. Structural integrity should also be checked, especially around the wheel arches and sills, where corrosion can compromise the bodywork without obvious external signs. The duplicate MOT entries raise suspicion of past neglect, so verifying service history for fluid changes, timing belt condition (if applicable), and exhaust emissions trends would be prudent.