2015 Hyundai IX35 1.7L Diesel · NV64 LDO

The vehicle’s most recent MOT test on 2026-01-10 confirms it remains roadworthy, with no defects or advisories recorded. This marks the fourth consecutive annual pass without failings, suggesting a stable maintenance history over the past two years. The absence of recurring advisories or defects implies that critical systems—such as brakes, suspension, and emissions—have been consistently compliant. However, the 2025-01-20 entry is anomalous, showing a duplicate date with a pass followed immediately by a fail, which may indicate a clerical error or a brief lapse in inspection. No faults were logged in either instance, so no mechanical issues were uncovered during those tests. The recorded mileage of 123,741 miles over approximately 11 years reflects an average of around 11,250 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps or spikes in the MOT history to suggest prolonged neglect or rapid wear. The most recent test aligns with the vehicle’s current condition, but the lack of detailed advisories means some wear-and-tear items—such as suspension bushes, brake pads, or tyres—could have been replaced privately without official record. The consistent annual testing pattern indicates at least basic compliance with legal requirements, though it does not guarantee proactive maintenance beyond the MOT threshold. A buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension components, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The brakes, while never failing an MOT, may show uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been driven hard or exposed to wet conditions. Corrosion at wheel arches, sills, or the subframe should be examined closely, as this is a common issue for vehicles of this era and mileage. The exhaust system and emissions should also be checked for leaks or excessive smoke, as these are frequently overlooked until they fail an MOT. Finally, the tyres—though not recorded in the MOT—should be assessed for tread depth, uneven wear, and structural integrity, as failing twice on tread suggests basic upkeep may have been inconsistent.