2015 Smart (mcc) Fortwo 0.9L Petrol · RV65 EOF

The most recent MOT history for this 2015 SMART Fortwo reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite no recorded defects on passing tests. The vehicle failed twice in July 2025 at 70,238 miles, a stark contrast to flawless passes in July 2024 and July 2023. This inconsistency suggests either a systematic oversight in pre-MOT preparation or genuine underlying issues that evaded detection during passing tests. The July 2025 failures alone—occurring on the same day—raise suspicion of last-minute adjustments or a critical component failing just before inspection. Without specific advisory notes, the cause remains speculative, but the trend implies either a lack of diligent maintenance or intermittent failures in components not always captured by the MOT tester’s scope. The mileage progression of 6,385 miles annually aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the abrupt jump from 57,226 miles in July 2023 to 61,063 miles by July 2024—covering just under a year—indicates a period of increased usage. This could point to a change in ownership or driving habits, potentially accelerating wear on suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers. The lack of gaps in testing suggests the vehicle was consistently driven rather than stored, which is generally positive for fluid systems but may have contributed to the repeated failures if critical components were neglected between services. No advisory notes in the record imply these issues were not preemptively addressed. Given the repeated failures without explicit defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the brake system, particularly the rear calipers and binding mechanisms, as these are common culprits in SMART models. The suspension—including rubber bushes and coil springs—should be scrutinised for wear or corrosion, especially around the subframe and wheel arches, where rust can compromise structural integrity. The exhaust system warrants close examination for leaks or excessive corrosion, as this model is prone to such failures. While the MOT record does not detail advisory faults, the repeated test failures suggest a pattern of unresolved issues, so thorough checks of the electrical system (e.g., sensor inputs, ABS functionality) and fluid levels (brake, coolant, power steering) are essential. The absence of corrosion advisories in recent tests does not guarantee its absence; a visual inspection of the underbody and wheel arches is critical.