2016 Renault Clio 0.9L Petrol · SD66 FDU

The most recent MOT tests for this 2016 Renault Clio, conducted just eight months ago on 2025-09-09, reveal an unusual but consistent pattern: the vehicle passed one test and failed the other on the same day at identical mileage, with no recorded defects or advisories in either instance. This suggests the tester did not identify any major failings or advisories during either assessment, though the simultaneous pass and fail at the same mileage is anomalous and warrants further scrutiny. The absence of any advisories or defects across all five MOT tests—spanning nearly three years—implies the vehicle has not experienced recurring mechanical issues that would trigger repeated failures. However, the lack of any recorded faults does not preclude underlying wear, particularly in high-mileage components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers, which are not always tested under standard MOT procedures. The recorded mileage of 80,912 miles over a decade suggests typical usage for its age, averaging around 8,091 miles annually. There are no significant gaps in service intervals visible in the MOT record, though the lack of service dates means we cannot confirm whether maintenance was performed between tests. The most notable pattern is the identical mileage at consecutive tests, which could indicate the vehicle was either stored or driven very consistently between 2023 and 2025. The absence of advisories or defects also means there is no evidence of neglect or rapid wear, though this does not rule out deferred maintenance by previous owners. Given the age and mileage, a buyer should expect some natural wear in consumable items like brake pads, tyres, and wiper blades, but the record does not indicate any history of severe or repeated failures. Given the MOT history’s clean slate, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension components, particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs, as these are common failure points in Renault Clio models of this age. The brakes, while not flagged in MOTs, should be checked for uneven wear, binding calipers, or corrosion on the discs, as these are not always tested comprehensively. Structural integrity—especially around wheel arches, sills, and the rear subframe—should also be examined for signs of corrosion or damage, as this is often overlooked in MOT tests but can compromise safety. The lack of advisories does not guarantee these areas are sound, but it does suggest the vehicle has not been subjected to severe abuse or neglect. A thorough brake fluid flush and power steering fluid check would also be advisable, as these are not routinely inspected in MOT tests.