2019 Levc TX 1.5L Hybrid electric (clean) · TXI 3115

The LEVC TX’s most recent MOT test on 2026-01-12—just seven months ago—shows an unusual sequence of two back-to-back tests, both passing without defects. While this suggests the vehicle cleared inspection on the first attempt, the double-testing pattern is atypical and may indicate administrative confusion or a rushed retest. No advisories or recurring faults appear in the record, meaning the tester did not flag any hidden issues such as worn suspension bushes, binding calipers, or excessive corrosion. However, the absence of defects does not preclude underlying problems, particularly in high-mileage components like the electric drivetrain’s cooling system or battery health, which are not routinely checked in standard MOTs. Mileage data remains entirely absent, leaving no way to assess whether the vehicle has been driven sparingly or excessively for its age. The most recent test in January 2026 follows a consistent 12-month cycle since the 2025-01-14 pass, but the lack of recorded mileage makes it impossible to determine if the vehicle has been stored, lightly used, or driven at high rates. The only notable gap is between July 2025 and January 2026, where no test occurred—a period that could imply either a missed deadline or a temporary withdrawal from use. Without mileage figures, even the most basic wear-and-tear expectations cannot be verified. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the electric drivetrain’s battery and cooling system, as these are not covered by standard MOT checks. The absence of advisories suggests no immediate suspension or brake issues, but the rear brakes—often prone to binding in electric vehicles due to regenerative braking—should be tested for smooth operation. Additionally, the vehicle’s structural integrity, particularly around the battery housing and underbody, should be examined for corrosion or damage, as electric vehicles are more susceptible to hidden electrical or thermal risks. The double-testing anomaly also warrants questioning the vehicle’s history, as it may signal inconsistent record-keeping or prior undocumented faults.