2015 Chrysler Ypsilon 1.2L Petrol · WR15 OLG

The 2015 Chrysler Ypsilon passed its most recent MOT on 1 April 2026 at 77,020 miles, just over two months ago, so the certificate remains highly current. The maintenance trend is broadly stable but shows a recurring pattern of tyre neglect. The tester flagged the offside rear tyre worn close to the legal limit with inner edge wear approaching exposed cords, a serious advisory that demands immediate attention. This is not an isolated incident. The previous test on 1 April 2025 at 67,299 miles recorded advisories on all four tyres for edge wear approaching the legal limit. Failing to address tyre condition across two consecutive annual tests suggests basic upkeep was skipped, raising questions about whether other consumables and components received regular inspection. The vehicle has covered 77,020 miles over roughly eleven years, averaging around 7,000 miles per year, which is typical for its age and indicates light, regular use rather than long periods standing. The mileage progression is steady and unbroken, with no suspicious gaps or sudden jumps. Between the April 2025 and April 2026 tests, the car added 9,721 miles, a modest increase consistent with continued daily use. The record is clean of mileage anomalies, and the annual test frequency confirms the vehicle remained in active service without extended lapses. Beyond the tyre wear, the 14 March 2024 test at 64,270 miles flagged a damaged offside rear suspension arm that was not seriously weakened at the time. A damaged suspension arm, even if not immediately critical, can accelerate wear on bushes, coil springs, and associated linkages over time. A buyer should inspect the rear suspension closely for play, uneven bush deterioration, and any corrosion on mounting points, particularly given the car's age. The binding or uneven tyre wear pattern also warrants a full four-wheel alignment check and inspection of steering and suspension geometry to rule out underlying tracking issues. The brake system and exhaust emissions have not attracted any recorded defects, which is encouraging, but the repeated tyre advisories point to a vehicle that may have been run close to minimum standards between services. A thorough in-person inspection should include a check of tyre date codes, tread depth across all four wheels, sidewall condition, and a dynamic road test to detect any pulling, vibration, or binding from the rear axle. The structural integrity of the subframe and suspension mounting points deserves close scrutiny given the earlier advisory on the rear arm. Overall, the car presents as mechanically sound with no major failures, but the tyre history signals a need for attentive ongoing maintenance.