2005 Honda CR-V 2.2L Diesel · YA05 FWG

The most recent MOT history for this 2005 Honda CR-V reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures just before passing tests, with the last two tests occurring within a single day in November 2025—one passing and one failing at nearly identical mileages (161,888 and 161,852). This suggests either a deliberate manipulation of test timing or a critical component failing just before the inspection window closes, both of which are red flags for reliability. The previous cycle in 2023 also showed a near-identical failure-passing sequence at 135,901 and 135,972 miles, reinforcing the suspicion of unresolved underlying issues. The lack of recorded defects in any test is unusual, as even minor advisories would typically appear, so this may indicate the tester overlooked serious faults or the vehicle was driven into the test in a deliberately clean state. The mileage progression of 7,709 miles per year is consistent with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the abrupt jumps between tests—particularly the 14,500-mile gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests—are notable. The 2023 failure and subsequent pass within days suggests the vehicle was either driven hard to accumulate miles quickly or sat unused until the last possible moment before inspection. Without service records, it’s impossible to confirm whether major components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or drivetrain bearings have been replaced, but the repeated near-failures imply these areas may be deteriorating. The 2025 tests occurred just six months ago, meaning any critical faults would have had minimal time to worsen, but the pattern of failure suggests a deeper issue rather than simple wear. Given the history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle where binding brakes were implied in past tests, and the condition of coil springs for sagging or corrosion. The lack of advisories on structural integrity in recent tests does not guarantee absence of rust, especially around wheel arches, subframes, or sills, which are common failure points on this model. The brakes, while not explicitly failed, warrant scrutiny for uneven wear or binding calipers, as the repeated near-failures could indicate a recurring issue. Finally, the exhaust emissions system should be checked for leaks or catalytic converter efficiency, as these are common causes of MOT failures in older vehicles. The absence of recorded defects does not equate to reliability—it may simply reflect a tester’s oversight or a vehicle driven into the test in a deliberately clean state.