DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid
Check service history

MERCEDES-BENZ SL2017 · 3.0L PETROL

6 JST

Vehicle Insight Summary

MERCEDES-BENZ SL (2017, PETROL, 2996cc) — mileage recorded at 35,305. MOT status: valid. Road tax: paid. Check full history before buying.

MOT
Valid
Expires 28/09/2026
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/12/2026
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2017
Engine
2996cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle passed its most recent MOT on 25 September 2025 at 35,305 miles, confirming it is currently roadworthy, though with multiple tyre-related advisories. The maintenance trend shows no improvement; the same front and rear tyres have carried cuts across three consecutive tests, and the offside front tyre has been fitted inside out for at least two years. This suggests ongoing neglect of basic tyre inspection and rotation, not a one-off oversight. The recorded mileage of 35,305 over nine years equates to an average of 3,923 miles annually, which is low for a sports car of this age. However, the gap between the 2022 and 2024 tests—nearly two years with no MOT—raises questions about usage patterns. The jump from 23,142 miles in December 2022 to 30,350 in September 2024 implies a period of higher-than-average use, followed by a prolonged static period before the 2025 tests. This kind of irregular use can accelerate rubber degradation, fluid breakdown, and corrosion in rarely driven components. A buyer must inspect the tyres closely for internal damage beneath the cuts, particularly on the nearside rear, which previously failed due to ply exposure. The repeated inside-out fitting of the offside front tyre indicates either gross mismanagement or replacement with incorrect parts, and the tyre’s condition should be verified by a specialist. The windscreen damage, while not failing, has persisted across three tests and may indicate prior impact or stress fractures that could worsen under vibration. Suspension bushes, brake calipers, and coil springs should be checked for stiffness or corrosion, as prolonged inactivity combined with sporadic use can cause binding or uneven wear. The absence of structural or exhaust advisories is reassuring, but the tyre pattern suggests the car has not been maintained to a standard expected for a premium model.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

88
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
A score of 88 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for 6JST

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle passed its most recent MOT on 25 September 2025 at 35,305 miles, confirming it is currently roadworthy, though with multiple tyre-related advisories. The maintenance trend shows no improvement; the same front and rear tyres have carried cuts across three consecutive tests, and the offside front tyre has been fitted inside out for at least two years. This suggests ongoing neglect of basic tyre inspection and rotation, not a one-off oversight. The recorded mileage of 35,305 over nine years equates to an average of 3,923 miles annually, which is low for a sports car of this age. However, the gap between the 2022 and 2024 tests—nearly two years with no MOT—raises questions about usage patterns. The jump from 23,142 miles in December 2022 to 30,350 in September 2024 implies a period of higher-than-average use, followed by a prolonged static period before the 2025 tests. This kind of irregular use can accelerate rubber degradation, fluid breakdown, and corrosion in rarely driven components. A buyer must inspect the tyres closely for internal damage beneath the cuts, particularly on the nearside rear, which previously failed due to ply exposure. The repeated inside-out fitting of the offside front tyre indicates either gross mismanagement or replacement with incorrect parts, and the tyre’s condition should be verified by a specialist. The windscreen damage, while not failing, has persisted across three tests and may indicate prior impact or stress fractures that could worsen under vibration. Suspension bushes, brake calipers, and coil springs should be checked for stiffness or corrosion, as prolonged inactivity combined with sporadic use can cause binding or uneven wear. The absence of structural or exhaust advisories is reassuring, but the tyre pattern suggests the car has not been maintained to a standard expected for a premium model.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 2017, this Mercedes-Benz Sl with plate 6 JST has undergone 5 MOT inspections since July 2021.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 80% pass rate, with 4 passes and 1 failure recorded. This is a strong MOT track record, suggesting the vehicle has been well-maintained.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Tyres (12 issues), Windscreen (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 11 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 1 failure item has been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords 285/30 ZR19 98Y YOKOHA”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY