2015 Peugeot Partner 1.6L Diesel · CP15 AEF

This Peugeot Partner has demonstrated a concerning pattern of repeated MOT failures over the past two years, despite no defects being recorded on any test. The most recent failure on 2025-07-11—just seven days before passing—suggests either a temporary technical issue resolved before inspection or a lack of consistent pre-test maintenance. The absence of advisories or defects in the records implies no systematic mechanical failures, but the repeated failures themselves indicate a pattern of neglect or inconsistent servicing. A buyer should treat this as a red flag for potential undocumented issues, particularly given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The mileage progression shows an average of around 11,300 miles annually, which aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age. However, the abrupt jumps between tests—such as the 1,627 miles covered between the 2024 failure and pass—could imply either rapid usage or periods of inactivity followed by sudden driving. The gap between the 2023 pass and the 2024 failure (over 9,000 miles) suggests the vehicle was in regular use, but the lack of intermediate servicing raises questions about whether routine maintenance was performed. Without service records, it’s impossible to confirm whether critical components like suspension bushes, brake calipers, or drivetrain fluids were addressed. Given the repeated MOT failures without recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear areas that often cause test failures. Focus on the suspension system—particularly rear coil springs and bushes—for signs of uneven wear or corrosion, as these frequently lead to advisory notes or failures. The braking system warrants close scrutiny, including rear binding calipers or warped discs, which might have been temporarily adjusted before tests. Structural integrity should also be checked, especially around wheel arches and sills, where rust can compromise safety without always being visible. The absence of advisories in the MOT history does not guarantee these areas are sound, but they should be thoroughly examined.