2015 Vauxhall Mokka 1.6L Petrol · DC15 ABU

The Vauxhall Mokka’s most recent MOT tests reveal a stable but curious pattern: the vehicle passed on July 9, 2025 , yet the same test date shows a failed entry for the same mileage, which is unusual and suggests either a duplicate or administrative error. No defects were recorded in either instance, and the preceding tests—all clean passes—confirm no recurring mechanical issues were detected by the tester. The July 2025 failure, however, warrants scrutiny, as it implies either a procedural oversight or a brief, undocumented issue that resolved itself before the retest. The vehicle’s roadworthiness remains uncompromised by the MOT history alone, but the duplicate entry raises questions about documentation consistency. The recorded mileage of 48,076 miles at the latest test aligns with an unusually low annual average of 4,371 miles over the past decade, which is well below the UK average for a vehicle of this age. This suggests either minimal use, prolonged periods of storage, or potential odometer manipulation. The mileage increments are steady but slow: 3,570 miles between the 2024 and 2025 tests, 4,092 miles between 2023 and 2024, and 6,595 miles between 2022 and 2023. While this pattern does not indicate excessive wear, it also does not reflect typical UK driving conditions, which could mean some components—such as suspension bushes, brake pads, or timing belt-related systems—may have aged beyond their expected service intervals. The lack of advisories or defects in the MOT history does not preclude hidden wear, particularly in areas prone to neglect when a car is not driven regularly. Given the clean MOT record, the most critical areas for an in-person inspection should focus on suspension integrity —particularly the condition of coil springs, bushes, and shock absorbers—given the low mileage but extended age. The brakes, though not flagged, should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, as corrosion can develop even in lightly used vehicles. Examine the subframe and wheel arches for signs of structural rust, especially if the car has spent time in damp conditions. The duplicate MOT entry also justifies verifying the vehicle’s full service history, as discrepancies in documentation often correlate with inconsistent maintenance. Finally, confirm the timing belt and water pump have been serviced within the manufacturer’s recommended intervals, as these components fail without warning and are not covered by MOT testing.