2002 Land Rover Range Rover 2.9L Diesel · EF52 AHG

This Range Rover’s most recent MOT tests, conducted in late 2025 at 226,637 miles, reveal a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite no recorded defects. The vehicle failed three times in a single month—on 3 November (218,036 miles), 2 November (218,039 miles), and then again on 24 November (226,637 miles)—before finally passing on the same day. While the lack of specific defect codes obscures precise issues, the repeated failures suggest either a persistent mechanical anomaly or administrative oversight in the testing process. The most recent pass, just six months ago, does not reflect meaningful progress, and the absence of advisories or partial failures implies either a critical component was overlooked or the vehicle was pushed through testing without thorough scrutiny. The mileage progression indicates a consistent annual average of around 9,400 miles, which aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age. There are no extended gaps suggesting neglect, nor abrupt spikes that would imply aggressive driving. However, the clustering of tests in late 2024 and 2025—with just over 8,000 miles accumulated between the 2024 pass and the 2025 failures—raises questions about whether the vehicle was driven regularly or simply brought in for MOTs without intermediate maintenance. The lack of advisories in prior tests also means any underlying issues may have gone unaddressed for extended periods. Given the repeated failures and the vehicle’s age, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension components, particularly the coil springs, bushes, and shock absorbers, which are common failure points in this model. The braking system warrants close examination, as binding calipers or worn brake discs are frequently undetected without a full functional test. Structural integrity should also be assessed, with a focus on corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as these areas are prone to deterioration in a vehicle of this vintage. The absence of defect codes in the MOT history makes it impossible to confirm specific issues, but the repeated failures strongly suggest a component or system has been consistently problematic.