DVLA verified
Tax valid

VOLKSWAGEN CADDY2005 · 2.0L DIESEL

FX55 ABF

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 2005 VOLKSWAGEN CADDY? It's a DIESEL with a 1968cc engine showing 163,026 miles. MOT is not recorded and it's taxed for the road. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Expired
Expires 10/06/2026
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/02/2027
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
2005
Engine
1968cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle currently holds a valid MOT, but the maintenance history reveals a concerning trend of structural degradation. While the vehicle passed its most recent test in June 2025 at 163,026 miles, this followed a significant failure just three miles prior. That failure identified critical structural damage to the offside front suspension spring mounting and a severely weakened nearside front seat belt anchorage. The transition from a major failure involving safety-critical structural points to a pass within such a short distance suggests that while immediate repairs were made, the underlying structural integrity of the chassis remains a point of concern. The mileage pattern is consistent with a 21-year-old commercial vehicle, averaging approximately 7,700 miles per year. The record shows steady usage with roughly 9,000 miles covered between May 2024 and June 2025, and approximately 3,100 miles between May 2023 and May 2024. This regular interval suggests the vehicle is used consistently rather than sitting for long periods, which is generally beneficial for mechanical components, though it has also accelerated the progression of the corrosion noted throughout the history. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the lower bodywork and chassis. The 2024 test flagged corrosion on both outer integral body structures and sills, and the 2025 failure highlighted significant structural damage to the spring mounting. These indicators suggest that the vehicle is prone to advanced rust that goes beyond surface level. Furthermore, the record shows recurring issues with anti-roll bar linkages and suspension arm bushes across multiple years, indicating that the front suspension assembly is nearing the end of its service life. Particular attention should be paid to the seat belt anchor point to ensure the previous structural failure was properly rectified and reinforced.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

50
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 50 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for FX55ABF

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 22, 2026, 04:38 PM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle currently holds a valid MOT, but the maintenance history reveals a concerning trend of structural degradation. While the vehicle passed its most recent test in June 2025 at 163,026 miles, this followed a significant failure just three miles prior. That failure identified critical structural damage to the offside front suspension spring mounting and a severely weakened nearside front seat belt anchorage. The transition from a major failure involving safety-critical structural points to a pass within such a short distance suggests that while immediate repairs were made, the underlying structural integrity of the chassis remains a point of concern. The mileage pattern is consistent with a 21-year-old commercial vehicle, averaging approximately 7,700 miles per year. The record shows steady usage with roughly 9,000 miles covered between May 2024 and June 2025, and approximately 3,100 miles between May 2023 and May 2024. This regular interval suggests the vehicle is used consistently rather than sitting for long periods, which is generally beneficial for mechanical components, though it has also accelerated the progression of the corrosion noted throughout the history. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the lower bodywork and chassis. The 2024 test flagged corrosion on both outer integral body structures and sills, and the 2025 failure highlighted significant structural damage to the spring mounting. These indicators suggest that the vehicle is prone to advanced rust that goes beyond surface level. Furthermore, the record shows recurring issues with anti-roll bar linkages and suspension arm bushes across multiple years, indicating that the front suspension assembly is nearing the end of its service life. Particular attention should be paid to the seat belt anchor point to ensure the previous structural failure was properly rectified and reinforced.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 2005, this Volkswagen Caddy with plate FX55 ABF has undergone 5 MOT inspections since May 2023.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 60% of its MOT tests, totaling 3 passes against 2 fails. This is an average MOT record. Some attention to recurring issues may be beneficial.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Suspension (6 issues), Lighting (4 issues), Bodywork (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 13 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 3 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced (7.1.1 (a) (i))”; “Offside Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area excessively damaged significantly reducing structural strength ”; “Offside Rear Fuel pipe leaking (6.1.3 (b) (i))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY