2015 Fiat Ducato 2.3L Diesel · GN65 ASV

The 2015 Fiat Ducato’s most recent MOT test on 2025-07-15 passed without defects, but the immediate preceding test on 2025-07-14 failed—despite identical mileage (30,972 vs. 30,988). This abrupt reversal suggests either a last-minute repair or a procedural anomaly, as no defects were recorded on either occasion. The pattern over the past two years shows repeated failures followed by passes at roughly 12-month intervals, with no consistent mechanical issues logged. While the vehicle has not exhibited recurring faults, the repeated test cycles imply either a lack of pre-MOT maintenance or a test centre’s inability to detect latent problems. The latest pass is only six months old, which is acceptable, but the lack of advisory notes means critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers were not formally assessed. The recorded mileage of 30,988 miles over 11 years—roughly 2,817 miles annually—is unusually low for a commercial van of this age, suggesting either minimal usage or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the 2024 and 2023 tests (2,816 miles in a year) and the 2025 tests (16 miles over two days) appears artificial, as the latter likely reflects a rushed retest rather than genuine mileage accumulation. Such low mileage can mask deeper issues, as components like suspension dampers and drivetrain seals degrade more slowly but still accumulate wear over time. The absence of mileage spikes also raises questions about whether the vehicle was ever subjected to heavy loads or regular use, which could have accelerated wear on critical systems. Given the lack of recorded defects, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should be the suspension—particularly the rear bushes and coil springs—for signs of uneven wear or corrosion, as these are common failure points in vans of this age. The repeated MOT failures without defects suggest the tester may not have probed deeply enough, so buyers should manually check for binding rear brakes, which were not explicitly ruled out in the tests. Exhaust emissions should also be scrutinised, as the vehicle failed twice in quick succession, potentially indicating a misfiring cylinder or failing catalytic converter. Finally, inspect the underbody for corrosion around the sills and wheel arches, as standing vehicles are prone to structural weakening. The absence of advisories in recent tests does not guarantee these areas are sound.