DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid

2016 SUZUKI CELERIO1.0L PETROL

HG65 AAE

Vehicle Insight Summary

Free vehicle summary for HG65 AAE: 2016 SUZUKI CELERIO (WHITE, PETROL). Mileage: 41,767. MOT: valid. Tax: taxed.

MOT
Valid
Expires 12/03/2027
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/02/2027
Powered by Experian Data
£8.99
Check outstanding finance, stolen records, write-off categories & mileage anomalies.
Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2016
Engine
998cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy following a successful pass in March 2026, but the maintenance history reveals a pattern of reactive rather than proactive care. The most recent test at 41,767 miles initially resulted in a failure due to critically thinned front brake pads and a defective offside windscreen wiper. While these issues were rectified to secure a pass, the immediate failure suggests the previous owner only addressed repairs when forced by the MOT tester rather than performing routine preventative maintenance. At 41,767 miles over ten years, the Suzuki Celerio shows low annual mileage, averaging approximately 4,177 miles per year. This low usage profile typically reduces wear on the drivetrain and engine, but it often leads to degradation of rubber components due to age. Between February 2024 and March 2026, the vehicle covered nearly 7,000 miles, yet it failed for structural tyre failures and worn brake components. This indicates that the condition of the components is dictated more by age and potential neglect than by mileage-related wear. A buyer should focus their inspection on the front suspension and braking system. The March 2025 test at 38,786 miles flagged worn lower suspension arm bushes on both sides, and while this did not cause a failure at the time, these components are prone to cracking over time. Furthermore, the failure in February 2024 for structural tears in the rear tyres suggests the vehicle may have sat stationary for long periods. Inspect the current tyres for sidewall cracking and check the brake calipers for binding or corrosion, which are common on low-mileage vehicles that are driven infrequently.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

58
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
✗ 2 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 58 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for HG65AAE

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked
Powered by Experian Data

Premium Vehicle History Data Locked

Unlock the full report to reveal outstanding finance agreements, police stolen markers, insurance write-off categories (Cat A/B/C/D/S/N), mileage anomaly checks, and plate changes.

Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 22 Jun 2026, 16:42
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy following a successful pass in March 2026, but the maintenance history reveals a pattern of reactive rather than proactive care. The most recent test at 41,767 miles initially resulted in a failure due to critically thinned front brake pads and a defective offside windscreen wiper. While these issues were rectified to secure a pass, the immediate failure suggests the previous owner only addressed repairs when forced by the MOT tester rather than performing routine preventative maintenance. At 41,767 miles over ten years, the Suzuki Celerio shows low annual mileage, averaging approximately 4,177 miles per year. This low usage profile typically reduces wear on the drivetrain and engine, but it often leads to degradation of rubber components due to age. Between February 2024 and March 2026, the vehicle covered nearly 7,000 miles, yet it failed for structural tyre failures and worn brake components. This indicates that the condition of the components is dictated more by age and potential neglect than by mileage-related wear. A buyer should focus their inspection on the front suspension and braking system. The March 2025 test at 38,786 miles flagged worn lower suspension arm bushes on both sides, and while this did not cause a failure at the time, these components are prone to cracking over time. Furthermore, the failure in February 2024 for structural tears in the rear tyres suggests the vehicle may have sat stationary for long periods. Inspect the current tyres for sidewall cracking and check the brake calipers for binding or corrosion, which are common on low-mileage vehicles that are driven infrequently.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Suzuki Celerio (HG65 AAE) from 2016 show a total of 5 MOT tests between February 2024 and March 2026.

Across its entire MOT history, this Suzuki has a 60% success rate (3 passes and 2 fails). While not perfect, the history shows a relatively typical pattern of MOT passes and fails.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Tyres (6 issues), Suspension (2 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Windscreen (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 6 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 5 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii))”; “Nearside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii))”; “Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY