DVLA verified
Check service history

2017 FORD RANGER3.2L Diesel

K14 KCT

Vehicle Insight Summary

2017 FORD RANGER — Diesel, 3198cc. This vehicle has 84,753 miles on record. MOT status: no valid MOT. Tax: not taxed. Review the complete history and specs.

MOT
Expired
Expires 02/01/2025
Tax
No data
Powered by Experian Data
£8.99
Check outstanding finance, stolen records, write-off categories & mileage anomalies.
Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI
Fuel
Diesel
Year
2017
Engine
3198cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a concerning roadworthiness trend characterized by recurring defects that indicate a reactive rather than proactive maintenance approach. While the most recent test in January 2024 at 84,753 miles passed, it carried over significant corrosion on both front coil springs and a damaged nearside track rod end dust cover. These specific suspension issues have remained flagged since at least 2021, suggesting that the previous owner only addresses mechanical faults when they reach the point of MOT failure. The mileage pattern is remarkably consistent for a nine-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 9,400 miles per year. There is a notable gap in records between June 2020 and December 2020, where the vehicle added roughly 7,000 miles. Since then, the usage has maintained a steady rate of about 9,000 to 10,000 miles per annum. This steady mileage suggests the vehicle has not been left to sit, but the frequency of failures and subsequent advisories indicates that components are being neglected between annual inspections. A buyer must conduct a thorough inspection of the front suspension and braking systems. The persistent corrosion on the coil springs is a high-risk factor as these components can snap without warning. Furthermore, the December 2022 failure at 72,322 miles revealed a seriously weakened offside front brake disc and thin pads, which follows a history of worn components noted in previous years. The buyer should check for uneven wear on the front tyres and ensure the track rod end has actually been replaced to prevent moisture ingress into the steering joint.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

38
/ 100 · Poor

Public record health check: Poor.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
✓ Good MOT pass rate (75%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 38 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for K14KCT

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked
Powered by Experian Data

Premium Vehicle History Data Locked

Unlock the full report to reveal outstanding finance agreements, police stolen markers, insurance write-off categories (Cat A/B/C/D/S/N), mileage anomaly checks, and plate changes.

Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 30 Jul 2026, 20:28
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a concerning roadworthiness trend characterized by recurring defects that indicate a reactive rather than proactive maintenance approach. While the most recent test in January 2024 at 84,753 miles passed, it carried over significant corrosion on both front coil springs and a damaged nearside track rod end dust cover. These specific suspension issues have remained flagged since at least 2021, suggesting that the previous owner only addresses mechanical faults when they reach the point of MOT failure. The mileage pattern is remarkably consistent for a nine-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 9,400 miles per year. There is a notable gap in records between June 2020 and December 2020, where the vehicle added roughly 7,000 miles. Since then, the usage has maintained a steady rate of about 9,000 to 10,000 miles per annum. This steady mileage suggests the vehicle has not been left to sit, but the frequency of failures and subsequent advisories indicates that components are being neglected between annual inspections. A buyer must conduct a thorough inspection of the front suspension and braking systems. The persistent corrosion on the coil springs is a high-risk factor as these components can snap without warning. Furthermore, the December 2022 failure at 72,322 miles revealed a seriously weakened offside front brake disc and thin pads, which follows a history of worn components noted in previous years. The buyer should check for uneven wear on the front tyres and ensure the track rod end has actually been replaced to prevent moisture ingress into the steering joint.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Checking the history for this 2017 Ford Ranger (K14 KCT), we found 4 MOT results in the period of December 2021 to January 2024.

Across its entire MOT history, this Ford has a 75% success rate (3 passes and 1 fails). The pass rate is roughly in line with national averages for vehicles of this age.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Suspension (8 issues), Brakes (7 issues), Tyres (6 issues), Lighting (2 issues), Steering (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 19 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 6 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Brake performance not tested (1.2.1 (g))”; “Offside Front Inner Brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))”; “Rear Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY