DVLA verified

NISSAN 2002 · 3.5L PETROL

K1 SSU

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 2002 NISSAN null? It's a PETROL with a 3495cc engine showing 5,052 miles. MOT is not recorded and it's not currently taxed. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Expired
Expires 07/07/2010
Tax
SORN
Statutory Off Road Notification
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2002
Engine
3495cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents as mechanically unserviceable, with the most recent MOT test on 2023-10-18 failing due to excessive exhaust emissions and incorrect headlamp aim. The failure indicates significant issues with the engine's emission control systems and lighting alignment. The tester noted carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon, and lambda readings exceeding manufacturer specifications, suggesting potential problems with fuel mixture, ignition timing, or catalytic converter function. Headlamp misalignment points to possible suspension or steering component wear. The absence of a driver’s airbag and aftermarket steering wheel installation raise concerns over safety compliance and modifications that may affect structural integrity or crash protection. These recurring issues suggest a lack of consistent maintenance or unresolved mechanical faults. The recorded mileage of 5,052 miles at the time of the latest test reflects a vehicle with extremely low usage over its 24-year lifespan. Mileage progression shows a steady increase from 545 miles in 2005 to 4,605 miles in 2009, with no major gaps in the record. However, the jump from 4,605 miles in 2009 to 5,052 miles in 2023 represents a period of minimal use, which may indicate extended storage or limited driving. The low annual average of approximately 210 miles further supports the likelihood of infrequent operation, potentially leading to component degradation such as rubber seals, battery deterioration, or fluid oxidation despite minimal mechanical stress. The repeated failures in emissions testing point to possible issues with the engine management system, including faulty sensors, degraded spark plugs, or a malfunctioning catalytic converter. The headlamp aiming faults suggest suspension or steering component wear, possibly exacerbated by the vehicle's long-term inactivity. Buyers should inspect the exhaust system for corrosion or damage, particularly around the manifold and catalytic converter areas. Suspension bushes and strut mounts should be checked for cracking or excessive play. Brake components, including discs and pads, require visual inspection for signs of rust or uneven wear, especially given the vehicle's age and low usage history. Structural integrity remains a concern due to the lack of comprehensive maintenance records beyond the initial tests. The presence of an aftermarket steering wheel and missing airbag indicate modifications that may not meet current safety standards. Any visible rust or corrosion on the chassis, particularly in wheel arches or underbody areas, should be assessed carefully. Tyre condition should be reviewed for dry rot or uneven wear patterns. A full inspection of the brake system, including caliper function and disc condition, is recommended. The vehicle's low mileage does not guarantee mechanical soundness, particularly where emissions and lighting systems are concerned.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

55
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 55 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for K1SSU

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents as mechanically unserviceable, with the most recent MOT test on 2023-10-18 failing due to excessive exhaust emissions and incorrect headlamp aim. The failure indicates significant issues with the engine's emission control systems and lighting alignment. The tester noted carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon, and lambda readings exceeding manufacturer specifications, suggesting potential problems with fuel mixture, ignition timing, or catalytic converter function. Headlamp misalignment points to possible suspension or steering component wear. The absence of a driver’s airbag and aftermarket steering wheel installation raise concerns over safety compliance and modifications that may affect structural integrity or crash protection. These recurring issues suggest a lack of consistent maintenance or unresolved mechanical faults. The recorded mileage of 5,052 miles at the time of the latest test reflects a vehicle with extremely low usage over its 24-year lifespan. Mileage progression shows a steady increase from 545 miles in 2005 to 4,605 miles in 2009, with no major gaps in the record. However, the jump from 4,605 miles in 2009 to 5,052 miles in 2023 represents a period of minimal use, which may indicate extended storage or limited driving. The low annual average of approximately 210 miles further supports the likelihood of infrequent operation, potentially leading to component degradation such as rubber seals, battery deterioration, or fluid oxidation despite minimal mechanical stress. The repeated failures in emissions testing point to possible issues with the engine management system, including faulty sensors, degraded spark plugs, or a malfunctioning catalytic converter. The headlamp aiming faults suggest suspension or steering component wear, possibly exacerbated by the vehicle's long-term inactivity. Buyers should inspect the exhaust system for corrosion or damage, particularly around the manifold and catalytic converter areas. Suspension bushes and strut mounts should be checked for cracking or excessive play. Brake components, including discs and pads, require visual inspection for signs of rust or uneven wear, especially given the vehicle's age and low usage history. Structural integrity remains a concern due to the lack of comprehensive maintenance records beyond the initial tests. The presence of an aftermarket steering wheel and missing airbag indicate modifications that may not meet current safety standards. Any visible rust or corrosion on the chassis, particularly in wheel arches or underbody areas, should be assessed carefully. Tyre condition should be reviewed for dry rot or uneven wear patterns. A full inspection of the brake system, including caliper function and disc condition, is recommended. The vehicle's low mileage does not guarantee mechanical soundness, particularly where emissions and lighting systems are concerned.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 2002, this Nissan Unknown with plate K1 SSU has undergone 5 MOT inspections since October 2005.

Across its entire MOT history, this Nissan has a 80% success rate (4 passes and 1 fails). This is a strong MOT track record, suggesting the vehicle has been well-maintained.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Exhaust & Emissions (3 issues), Lighting (2 issues), Steering (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

A total of 6 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Driver's airbag missing After Market Steering Wheel Fitted (7.1.5 (a))”; “Offside Front Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))”; “Nearside Front Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY