2015 Citroen C4 1.6L Diesel · KN15 AEB

The most recent MOT test on 19 June 2026 confirms the vehicle remains roadworthy, with no defects recorded at 86,679 miles. However, the history reveals a concerning trend in the 2024 test, where the tester flagged reduced damping effect on both front shock absorbers and minor tyre damage to the near-side front and rear tyres. This is the only instance of advisories in the past five years, suggesting either a one-off oversight or a component nearing failure. The absence of defects in the last two tests indicates the issues were addressed, but the suspension and tyre conditions warrant closer scrutiny. The vehicle’s current MOT status does not guarantee ongoing reliability, particularly for components that were previously compromised. The mileage progression shows a steady, typical accumulation for a vehicle of this age, averaging around 7,880 miles annually. There are no unusual gaps or spikes in usage, with consistent intervals between tests—approximately 12,000 miles between each MOT over the past five years. The most notable deviation occurred between the 2023 and 2024 tests, where mileage increased by 4,489 miles in a year, yet no defects were recorded at that stage. This suggests the vehicle was driven regularly without severe neglect, though the suspension and tyre advisories in 2024 imply deferred maintenance or wear beyond standard expectations. A prospective buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the front suspension, particularly the shock absorbers, as the 2024 advisory indicates compromised damping. The near-side tyres, which showed damage in 2024, should be examined for uneven wear, cracking, or structural integrity—failing twice on tread suggests basic upkeep may have been inconsistent. Additionally, the absence of further advisories does not rule out hidden corrosion, especially in the wheel arches or sills, which are common failure points for this model age. The brakes, steering, and exhaust system have not been flagged, but a thorough check of brake pad thickness, caliper binding, and rust penetration in the subframe would be prudent. The vehicle’s structural integrity should also be assessed for signs of panel corrosion or frame damage, as these are critical but often overlooked risks in older vehicles.