2015 Citroen C4 1.6L Diesel · KN15 AEJ

The most recent MOT tests on this 2015 Citroën C4 demonstrate a stable but borderline roadworthiness pattern. The vehicle passed on 2026-02-20 at 132,646 miles, though it failed the prior test at 132,645 miles—an unusual but technically valid outcome given the negligible mileage difference. No defects were recorded in either instance, suggesting the tester did not identify any critical failings. However, the repeated testing at the same mileage implies either a last-minute pre-sale service or a minor oversight in the inspection process. The previous clean passes in 2025 and 2024 further indicate no recurring mechanical issues were formally logged, though this does not preclude hidden wear. The recorded mileage of 132,646 miles over approximately 11 years equates to an average of around 12,000 miles annually, which is elevated for a vehicle of this age. This suggests consistent use rather than long periods of inactivity, which could accelerate wear on suspension bushes, coil springs, and drivetrain components. Notably, the gap between tests in 2024—just two days apart—follows the same pattern as the 2026 tests, reinforcing the possibility of deliberate pre-test servicing. Without intermediate MOT records, it is impossible to confirm whether the vehicle underwent regular maintenance between these intervals, but the high mileage per year warrants scrutiny of high-wear items. Given the lack of formal failings in the MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The repeated testing at identical mileages raises suspicion of potential binding calipers or worn brake discs, even if not flagged in the MOT. Exhaust emissions should also be checked, as older Citroën models can develop catalytic converter issues over time. Corrosion in wheel arches, sills, and subframe areas is another critical concern, especially if the vehicle has been exposed to salted roads or poor storage conditions. The absence of advisories in the record does not rule out these risks—only a thorough mechanical examination will confirm their presence.