DVLA verified

FORD MONDEO1994 · 1.8L PETROL

L522 DPR

Vehicle Insight Summary

Free vehicle summary for L522 DPR: 1994 FORD MONDEO (BLUE, PETROL). Mileage: 89,244. MOT: not recorded. Tax: untaxed.

MOT
Failed
No data
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/12/2005
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1994
Engine
1796cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently unroadworthy due to a complete lack of a valid MOT certificate for the past twenty years. The last recorded test on 25 May 2006 at 89,244 miles resulted in a comprehensive failure with multiple mechanical and safety defects. Given that no testing data exists beyond this date, there is no evidence to suggest the current state of the structural integrity or mechanical components. The maintenance history reflects a period of significant neglect rather than a stable or improving trend. At 32 years of age, the recorded mileage of 89,244 miles is exceptionally low, averaging approximately 2,789 miles per year. While low mileage often suggests less wear on the drivetrain, the two-decade gap in records indicates the vehicle likely sat stationary for long periods. Such inactivity typically leads to the degradation of rubber components, perished fluids, and seized brake calipers, which are not reflected by mileage alone. The lack of data makes it impossible to determine if the mileage has progressed or remained static recently. A physical inspection must prioritize the critical areas that were previously flagged during the final test. The 2006 report identified excessive play in both front suspension arms and deteriorated anti-roll bar linkage mountings, suggesting the entire front suspension geometry requires overhaul. The tester also noted excessively pitted front brake discs, a binding nearside rear brake, and corroded brake pipes. You must inspect the chassis for deep structural corrosion, as long-term storage of vehicles from this era often leads to hidden rust in the sills and mounting points.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

35
/ 100 · Poor

Public record health check: Poor.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
✗ Poor MOT pass rate (0%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 35 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for L522DPR

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently unroadworthy due to a complete lack of a valid MOT certificate for the past twenty years. The last recorded test on 25 May 2006 at 89,244 miles resulted in a comprehensive failure with multiple mechanical and safety defects. Given that no testing data exists beyond this date, there is no evidence to suggest the current state of the structural integrity or mechanical components. The maintenance history reflects a period of significant neglect rather than a stable or improving trend. At 32 years of age, the recorded mileage of 89,244 miles is exceptionally low, averaging approximately 2,789 miles per year. While low mileage often suggests less wear on the drivetrain, the two-decade gap in records indicates the vehicle likely sat stationary for long periods. Such inactivity typically leads to the degradation of rubber components, perished fluids, and seized brake calipers, which are not reflected by mileage alone. The lack of data makes it impossible to determine if the mileage has progressed or remained static recently. A physical inspection must prioritize the critical areas that were previously flagged during the final test. The 2006 report identified excessive play in both front suspension arms and deteriorated anti-roll bar linkage mountings, suggesting the entire front suspension geometry requires overhaul. The tester also noted excessively pitted front brake discs, a binding nearside rear brake, and corroded brake pipes. You must inspect the chassis for deep structural corrosion, as long-term storage of vehicles from this era often leads to hidden rust in the sills and mounting points.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Ford Mondeo (L522 DPR) from 1994 show a total of 1 MOT test between May 2006 and May 2006.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 0% pass rate, with 0 passes and 1 failure recorded. Given the frequent MOT failures, it is worth checking if major repairs have been properly addressed.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Windscreen (5 issues), Tyres (3 issues), Lighting (3 issues), Brakes (3 issues), Suspension (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 3 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 18 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)”; “Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)”; “Nearside Rear rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY