IsItAGoodCar
Official DVLA Record

2002 Lexus RX300 3.0L Petrol · LT52 ADO

LT52 ADO

2002 Lexus RX300 (3.0L, petrol). First registered 28 Nov 2002. Recorded mileage 100,776 miles. MOT expired on 09 Sept 2026.

Make & Model
LEXUS RX300
Year / Origin
2002 · Wimbledon (South London)
Safety Recall
Unknown
MOT Status
Expired on 09 Sept 2026
Road Tax
—
Recorded Mileage
100,776 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 3.0L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Expired
Expired on 09 Sept 2026
Tax Status
Check Tax
Click to check rates
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2002
Engine
2995cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The most recent MOT test for this 2002 Lexus RX300 was conducted on 2025-08-28, resulting in a passing grade despite persistent minor and advisory issues that have been recurrent across the past two years. While the vehicle passed in August 2024 and August 2023, the failure in August 2025—along with the repeated advisories and minor defects—suggests a pattern of wear and potential underlying issues that may not have been fully addressed. The front exhaust leak and tyre wear close to legal limits are particularly concerning, indicating either neglect in exhaust system maintenance or consistent, heavy cornering that accelerates tyre degradation. The presence of a near-side stop lamp failure in 2024 and an offside stop lamp failure in 2021 further highlights a recurring electrical or wiring issue that could escalate if not rectified promptly. The recorded mileage of 100,776 miles for a vehicle aged approximately 24 years represents a remarkably low annual usage rate of around 4,199 miles per year, which is unusually low for a vehicle of this age and model. Such low mileage often correlates with prolonged periods of inactivity, particularly if the vehicle has been stored in a garage or kept in a non-operational state for extended periods. However, this usage profile could also suggest careful, light-duty operation, though the absence of service records or higher mileage would be more typical for a vehicle that has been driven regularly over its lifespan. The low mileage alone does not guarantee structural integrity or internal component health, as standing vehicles are prone to issues such as corrosion in brake systems, suspension components, and electrical connections, which can develop silently over time. Given the MOT history and the vehicle’s age and mileage, the buyer should conduct a thorough physical inspection to address both the recurring advisories and potential standing-related wear. First, examine the front exhaust system for signs of corrosion or further deterioration beyond the minor leak noted in the MOT, as flexing and rear box issues may indicate a compromised manifold or catalytic converter. Listen for exhaust noise variations during acceleration or braking, which could reveal leaks or structural weaknesses. The tyre wear advisories—particularly the offside and near-side front tyres worn close to legal limits—demand attention; check for uneven wear patterns, which may signal alignment or suspension issues. On a test drive, monitor for excessive vibration, clunking noises from the front suspension, or uneven tyre wear that could indicate binding calipers, worn coil springs, or damaged suspension bushes. Additionally, inspect the brake system for signs of corrosion on discs, binding calipers, or uneven pad wear, as the advisories suggest ongoing wear beyond normal limits. Look for brake fluid leaks under the vehicle and check for a spongy or pulsating pedal, which could indicate hydraulic issues or warped discs. For the 12V battery, given the low annual mileage and potential prolonged standing, test its charge capacity and clean the terminals for corrosion, as standing vehicles are particularly susceptible to battery failure. Inspect the brake discs for corrosion or binding, especially if the vehicle has been stored for extended periods, as moisture and road salt can accelerate rusting. Check the tyre sidewalls for signs of perishing or cracking, which can compromise structural integrity and increase the risk of blowouts. Verify that all fluid levels—brake, coolant, and power steering—are topped up and that the fluids are within their recommended service intervals, as fluids degrade over time regardless of mileage. Finally, ensure the service book is up to date, even if mileage is low, to confirm that scheduled maintenance like oil changes, timing belt replacement, and suspension servicing have been completed. If no service records are available, prioritise a professional inspection of the drivetrain, transmission, and exhaust system to mitigate the risk of hidden mechanical issues.

LT52 ADO Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 28/08/2025
  • 100,776 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 8 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring tyres items (9 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
35
/ 100 · Poor
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Poor

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for LT52ADO

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Finance
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Write-off
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Salvage
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Imported
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Exported
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Scrapped
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Destruction
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
V5C Logbook
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

LT52 ADO Mileage History

  1. 21/08/202390,597 mi
  2. 02/09/202496,674 mi+6,077 mi
  3. 02/09/202496,674 mi
  4. 26/08/2025100,753 mi+4,079 mi
  5. 28/08/2025100,776 mi+23 mi

Average of roughly 5,038 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

LT52 ADO MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 1 Oct 2026, 04:22
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2002 Lexus Rx300 (LT52 ADO) between August 2023 and August 2025.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 28 August 2025 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Tyres (9 issues), Lighting (7 issues), Suspension (2 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (2 issues). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 12 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Rear Inner Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii))”; “Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY