2011 Renault Master 2.5L Diesel · LX61 BAA

This Renault Master has demonstrated consistent roadworthiness over its MOT history, with every test since 2022 passing without any recorded defects or advisories. The most recent inspection on 2026-02-25, at 210,136 miles, confirms no issues with critical systems such as brakes, suspension, exhaust emissions, or structural integrity. While the absence of faults suggests the vehicle has been maintained at a basic level, the lack of advisories also implies that even minor wear—such as worn suspension bushes or binding calipers—has not been addressed between tests. The pattern of clean passes indicates no obvious worsening trend, though the high mileage demands thorough scrutiny of high-wear components. The recorded mileage of 210,136 miles over 15 years equates to approximately 14,000 miles annually, which is elevated for a commercial van of this age. The most significant mileage jump occurred between the 2023 (153,549 miles) and 2024 (169,024 miles) tests, accumulating 15,475 miles in under a year—a rate that could accelerate wear on drivetrain components, suspension, and brake systems. The regular 12-month intervals between tests suggest the vehicle has been in active use without prolonged periods of neglect, though the high annual mileage raises concerns about the longevity of consumables like tyres, brake discs, and clutch assemblies. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of suspension components, particularly the rear coil springs and bushes, which are prone to fatigue at this mileage. The brakes, though not flagged in tests, warrant close examination for uneven wear, glazed pads, or warped discs, especially if the vehicle has been driven heavily. Corrosion should be checked at wheel arches, sills, and underbody, as structural rust can compromise safety without immediate MOT failure. The exhaust system and emissions controls should also be inspected for leaks or excessive smoke, as these are not always captured in routine MOT checks. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are sound—only that they passed the minimum test thresholds at the time.