DVLA verified

FORD MONDEO1994 · 1.8L DIESEL

M710 FDU

Vehicle Insight Summary

1994 FORD MONDEO — DIESEL, 1753cc. This vehicle has 155,677 miles on record. MOT status: no valid MOT. Tax: not taxed. Review the complete history and specs.

MOT
Expired
Expires 25/06/2008
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/12/2008
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
1994
Engine
1753cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT, dated 27 June 2007 at 155,677 miles, passed with zero defects. That clean result is now nearly nineteen years old, meaning the vehicle has no verified roadworthiness status today. The maintenance trend cannot be assessed as stable, improving, or worsening because the record ends in 2007. The last two tests, however, show a pattern of resolving faults. The September 2006 failure at 152,729 miles flagged seven items, including excessively corroded rear brake pipes, low service brake efficiency, and a worn nearside front tyre. By the October 2006 retest at 152,803 miles, the rear brake pipe, headlamp, corrosion, tyre, and brake efficiency defects had all cleared, leaving only minor items: slightly corroded front brake pipes, slightly pitted front discs, and slight play in a lower suspension arm inner bush. The June 2007 test then recorded no defects at all, suggesting the previous minor faults were addressed. The mileage progression is unusual. Between the September 2006 failure at 152,729 miles and the October 2006 pass at 152,803 miles, just 74 miles were covered in sixteen days. The mileage then remained frozen at 155,677 miles for the June 2007 test, a gap of over 2,800 miles unaccounted for across eight months, or the reading may reflect a recording anomaly. For a 1994 vehicle now thirty-two years old, the total of 155,677 miles equates to roughly 4,865 miles per year, which is low. Combined with the long gap since the last test, this points to very light use or prolonged periods of standing, both of which carry their own risks. A buyer should treat this car as untested and unverified. The 2006 record shows recurring brake pipe corrosion and pitted front discs, so the entire braking system needs close inspection, including flexible hard lines, calipers, and the handbrake circuit. Slight play in a lower suspension arm inner bush appeared in both 2006 tests, meaning the front suspension bushes, ball joints, and coil springs should be checked for wear and perishing from age. The September 2006 failure noted outer body corrosion on the offside, so sills, arches, and structural mounting points must be examined for advanced rust, particularly given the car has sat without a valid MOT for nearly two decades. Tyres, rubber hoses, and fluid condition should all be assumed degraded through age and inactivity.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

50
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (67%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 50 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for M710FDU

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

MOT data last updated: 6/4/2026, 3:40:00 PM

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT, dated 27 June 2007 at 155,677 miles, passed with zero defects. That clean result is now nearly nineteen years old, meaning the vehicle has no verified roadworthiness status today. The maintenance trend cannot be assessed as stable, improving, or worsening because the record ends in 2007. The last two tests, however, show a pattern of resolving faults. The September 2006 failure at 152,729 miles flagged seven items, including excessively corroded rear brake pipes, low service brake efficiency, and a worn nearside front tyre. By the October 2006 retest at 152,803 miles, the rear brake pipe, headlamp, corrosion, tyre, and brake efficiency defects had all cleared, leaving only minor items: slightly corroded front brake pipes, slightly pitted front discs, and slight play in a lower suspension arm inner bush. The June 2007 test then recorded no defects at all, suggesting the previous minor faults were addressed. The mileage progression is unusual. Between the September 2006 failure at 152,729 miles and the October 2006 pass at 152,803 miles, just 74 miles were covered in sixteen days. The mileage then remained frozen at 155,677 miles for the June 2007 test, a gap of over 2,800 miles unaccounted for across eight months, or the reading may reflect a recording anomaly. For a 1994 vehicle now thirty-two years old, the total of 155,677 miles equates to roughly 4,865 miles per year, which is low. Combined with the long gap since the last test, this points to very light use or prolonged periods of standing, both of which carry their own risks. A buyer should treat this car as untested and unverified. The 2006 record shows recurring brake pipe corrosion and pitted front discs, so the entire braking system needs close inspection, including flexible hard lines, calipers, and the handbrake circuit. Slight play in a lower suspension arm inner bush appeared in both 2006 tests, meaning the front suspension bushes, ball joints, and coil springs should be checked for wear and perishing from age. The September 2006 failure noted outer body corrosion on the offside, so sills, arches, and structural mounting points must be examined for advanced rust, particularly given the car has sat without a valid MOT for nearly two decades. Tyres, rubber hoses, and fluid condition should all be assumed degraded through age and inactivity.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Ford Mondeo (M710 FDU) from 1994 show a total of 3 MOT tests between September 2006 and June 2007.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 67% pass rate, with 2 passes and 1 failure recorded. While not perfect, the history shows a relatively typical pattern of MOT passes and fails.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Brakes (6 issues), Lighting (2 issues), Suspension (2 issues), Tyres (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 8 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 2 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)”; “Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY