2015 Toyota Yaris 1.4L Diesel · RK64 AFA

The vehicle’s most recent MOT test on 2026-01-08 confirms it passed without recorded defects, though it failed the previous test just six days earlier at the same mileage (100,629). This abrupt reversal suggests either a minor oversight in the first test or a late-stage repair before the second attempt. The pattern of passing tests in January 2025 and January 2024—each with no defects—indicates a stable roadworthiness trend over the past two years, though the January 2026 failures are unusual and warrant scrutiny of what may have been addressed between tests. The lack of advisories or recurring faults in the history implies no chronic issues, but the failed tests raise questions about whether critical components were overlooked or hastily repaired. The recorded mileage of 100,631 miles over approximately 11 years aligns with typical usage for this vehicle’s age, averaging around 9,148 miles annually. There are no obvious gaps or spikes in mileage between tests, though the January 2026 failures occurred at nearly identical mileages (91,990 and 100,629), suggesting the vehicle was driven consistently without prolonged periods of inactivity. The absence of mileage jumps or extended storage periods reduces concerns about accelerated wear from neglect, but the rapid accumulation of miles in the past year (18,641 miles between January 2025 and January 2026) may have contributed to the recent test failures. Given the lack of recorded defects in prior tests, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of components that commonly fail at this mileage, particularly brakes and suspension. The January 2026 failures, despite identical mileages, hint at potential issues with brake binding, warped discs, or worn pads—common in high-mileage vehicles. The suspension should be checked for worn bushes, coil springs, or excessive play in joints, as these often degrade gradually without MOT detection. Additionally, the exhaust system and underbody should be inspected for corrosion, especially around the rear subframe and sills, given the vehicle’s age. Tyre condition, while not flagged in tests, should be verified, as failing twice on tread depth suggests previous owners may have deferred basic maintenance.