2019 Ford Kuga 2.0L Diesel · SF68 AAX

The most recent MOT history for this 2019 Ford Kuga, tested just six months ago on 2025-11-13, presents an unusual but technically stable roadworthiness picture. The vehicle passed the test despite an identical retest on the same day at the same mileage (142,170), with no defects recorded in either instance. This suggests the tester did not identify any critical failings during the examination, though the lack of advisories or defects makes it impossible to confirm whether routine wear items were overlooked or simply not present. The prior test in April 2024 at 135,853 miles also passed without issues, indicating no worsening trend in major systems over the past two years. However, the absence of advisories or defects in any test is notable—most vehicles of this age and mileage accumulate at least minor advisories for items like suspension bushes, brake pads, or corrosion. The recorded mileage of 142,170 miles over seven years equates to approximately 20,310 miles annually, which is unusually high for a vehicle of this age. This rate of accumulation suggests either consistent heavy use or prolonged periods of inactivity followed by rapid mileage spikes. The gap between the April 2024 test (135,853 miles) and the November 2025 tests (142,170 miles) represents just under 6,300 miles in roughly 19 months, averaging around 3,300 miles per year—still elevated but less aggressive than the overall trend. The lack of intermediate MOT tests or service records means there is no way to verify whether maintenance was performed at regular intervals or if critical inspections were deferred. Given the sparse MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear components that often go unnoticed in basic MOT tests. The suspension, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, should be examined for excessive play or corrosion, as these are common failure points at this mileage. Brake discs and calipers warrant close scrutiny, especially if the vehicle has been driven hard, as binding or uneven wear could indicate neglected servicing. Structural integrity, including wheel arches, sills, and subframe connections, should be inspected for signs of corrosion or damage, particularly given the vehicle’s age and mileage. Tyre condition, while not reflected in the MOT, should be checked for uneven wear patterns that might suggest alignment or suspension issues. The absence of advisories in past tests does not guarantee these areas are sound—only that they were not severe enough to fail the MOT at the time of testing.