DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid
Check service history

FORD C-MAX2015 · 1.5L DIESEL

UP07 ELL

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 2015 FORD C-MAX? It's a DIESEL with a 1499cc engine showing 86,920 miles. MOT is valid and it's taxed for the road. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Valid
Expires 11/09/2026
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/08/2026
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
2015
Engine
1499cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy with a maintenance trend that appears stable. The most recent MOT inspection conducted in September 2025 at 86,920 miles resulted in no defects, indicating that previous mechanical issues have been addressed. While the car failed a test in 2024 due to a non-functional position lamp and mirror damage, the subsequent clean pass suggests the current owner is reactive to MOT-related safety-critical rectifications. At 11 years old with 86,920 miles, the Ford C-Max averages approximately 7,900 miles per year, which aligns with typical usage for a family vehicle of this age. The records show consistent mileage accumulation, with roughly 13,700 miles covered between August 2023 and September 2024, and another 22,100 miles in the following year. This regular interval of use suggests the vehicle has not suffered from long periods of stagnation, which often leads to degradation of rubber components and fluid seals. A buyer should pay close attention to the front suspension geometry. The August 2023 test at 64,819 miles flagged worn bushes on both the nearside and offside front lower suspension arms. Although these did not result in a failure at that time, suspension components are prone to accelerated wear on this model. A physical inspection should specifically check for any play in the arms or audible clunking over bumps, which would indicate the bushes are now nearing replacement. The 2022 advisory regarding a nearside rear tyre worn to the limit suggests potential issues with alignment or basic lack of maintenance in the past. While the most recent test showed no tyre issues, the buyer should verify the remaining tread depth across all tyres and check for uneven wear patterns. The minor mirror damage noted in 2024 should also be inspected to ensure the housing is securely mounted and the glass is not compromised.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

78
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
✗ Outstanding recall notice
A score of 78 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for UP07ELL

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 22, 2026, 04:20 PM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy with a maintenance trend that appears stable. The most recent MOT inspection conducted in September 2025 at 86,920 miles resulted in no defects, indicating that previous mechanical issues have been addressed. While the car failed a test in 2024 due to a non-functional position lamp and mirror damage, the subsequent clean pass suggests the current owner is reactive to MOT-related safety-critical rectifications. At 11 years old with 86,920 miles, the Ford C-Max averages approximately 7,900 miles per year, which aligns with typical usage for a family vehicle of this age. The records show consistent mileage accumulation, with roughly 13,700 miles covered between August 2023 and September 2024, and another 22,100 miles in the following year. This regular interval of use suggests the vehicle has not suffered from long periods of stagnation, which often leads to degradation of rubber components and fluid seals. A buyer should pay close attention to the front suspension geometry. The August 2023 test at 64,819 miles flagged worn bushes on both the nearside and offside front lower suspension arms. Although these did not result in a failure at that time, suspension components are prone to accelerated wear on this model. A physical inspection should specifically check for any play in the arms or audible clunking over bumps, which would indicate the bushes are now nearing replacement. The 2022 advisory regarding a nearside rear tyre worn to the limit suggests potential issues with alignment or basic lack of maintenance in the past. While the most recent test showed no tyre issues, the buyer should verify the remaining tread depth across all tyres and check for uneven wear patterns. The minor mirror damage noted in 2024 should also be inspected to ensure the housing is securely mounted and the glass is not compromised.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Ford C-Max (UP07 ELL) from 2015 show a total of 5 MOT tests between August 2022 and September 2025.

With 4 passes and 1 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 80%. The car boasts an impressive record, which typically reflects a conscientious ownership history.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Lighting (3 issues), Suspension (2 issues), Tyres (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 4 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 1 failure item has been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY