2015 Infiniti Q50 2.1L Diesel · VX65 AUV

The most recent MOT history for this 2015 Infiniti Q50 reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite no recorded defects being logged. The vehicle underwent two tests on 2026-04-01—one passing and one failing—at identical mileage (93,196 miles), followed by a clean pass in April 2025 (88,734 miles) and another failure just eight days earlier (88,729 miles). This inconsistency suggests either a technical anomaly during testing, potential evasion of genuine inspection, or an underlying issue that intermittently triggers failure criteria. The lack of specific defect codes further complicates assessment, but the repeated failures at similar mileage intervals imply a need for scrutiny of systems prone to fluctuating faults, such as emissions or electrical components. The recorded mileage progression of approximately 8,472 miles annually aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, without obvious signs of neglect or excessive wear. The gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests (around 3,600 miles in a year) is standard for MOT intervals, though the rapid accumulation of 4,462 miles between the two 2025 failures suggests the vehicle was driven shortly before both tests. There are no extended periods of inactivity or unusually low mileage to indicate prolonged storage, which could have masked wear. However, the absence of pre-MOT servicing records means critical maintenance—such as brake fluid changes, suspension servicing, or timing belt checks—cannot be confirmed. Given the repeated failures without defect details, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the emissions system, particularly the DPF or catalytic converter, as these are common causes of intermittent MOT rejections. The suspension components—front and rear bushes, coil springs, and strut mounts—should be examined for excessive wear or corrosion, especially given the vehicle’s age. Binding brake calipers or unevenly worn discs, which might not always trigger a failure but could pose a safety risk, should also be checked. Structural integrity, particularly around the wheel arches and sills, warrants scrutiny for corrosion, as this is often overlooked until it compromises critical components. The lack of advisory notes in the MOT history does not guarantee these areas are sound, so visual and functional checks are essential.