2022 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD Electricity · 7 JMR

The 2022 TESLA MODEL Y LONG RANGE AWD carries a persistent pattern of rear tyre wear advisories across both the near-side and off-side rear positions, with the same size specification 255.40R 20 repeatedly flagged as worn close to legal limits and appearing worn on the outer edge. Despite passing the most recent MOT examination on 2025-09-22, this recurring advisory indicates that the rear suspension system and tyre contact patch have not been adequately addressed, suggesting either inconsistent maintenance intervals or underlying alignment and bearing wear that has progressed despite the vehicle's relatively short ownership period. The presence of two separate tyre-related advisories within a single test cycle further underscores that the current condition does not represent optimal roadworthiness, even though no other systems failed during that assessment. The recorded odometer reading of 81,513 miles accumulated over approximately four years translates to roughly 20,378 miles per annum, a rate that significantly outpaces typical usage for a model of this age and class. Such a high annual mileage accumulation often correlates with accelerated wear on suspension components, brake pads, and drivetrain elements, particularly where stress concentrations are highest such as the rear axle housing and wheel arches. While the exact timing of prior MOTs is not specified in the available record, the combination of elevated mileage alongside the recurrent tyre advisories implies that the vehicle may have experienced prolonged periods of heavy use or infrequent servicing, leaving less time for regular component replacement and inspection. This usage profile warrants particular attention when evaluating whether the current rubber and metal parts remain within their expected service life given the cumulative exposure. Focused on the rear tyre wear advisories, the buyer should expect to inspect the inner and outer shoulder areas of both the near-side and off-side rear tyres for uneven tread depth, cupping, or edge cracking that would confirm the "worn on edge" description from the MOT report. A visual and tactile check of the tyre sidewalls will reveal if the recommended 5.2.3 (e) standard has indeed been exceeded, and any soft or bulging spots should prompt immediate investigation of related suspension bushings and mounting hardware. Additionally, the windscreen damage noted as non-critical still requires verification for water ingress or frame flex that could compromise structural integrity, though this item did not impede the driver's field of view according to the MOT findings. Beyond the tyre advisories, the MOT record highlights that the body underside and engine undertrays were fitted in a manner that restricted access for certain component inspections, which may have delayed identification of earlier subsurface issues. Given the high mileage trajectory, buyers should also consider the likelihood of accelerated degradation in the rear differential and swingarm attachments, as these areas typically see the greatest stress loads during extended highway and mixed-use cycles. A practical test-drive assessment should involve gentle cornering to monitor for any pulling or vibration that might indicate misalignment stemming from the reported tyre wear pattern, while paying special attention to how the suspension responds to bumps to detect early signs of bushing fatigue or broken tie-rod ends that could develop rapidly under the current usage intensity.