2014 Citroen Nemo 1.4L Petrol · AO63 UOS

The Citroën Nemo’s MOT history presents an unusual but technically clean record, with no defects logged across the three most recent tests—two in September 2024 (196,702 miles) and one in August 2025 (199,224 miles). The vehicle passed both attempts in each of those years, suggesting that whatever prompted the retests was resolved without mechanical failures. This stability implies no major structural or safety-critical issues have emerged recently, though the repeated retests at identical mileages in 2024 and 2025 hint at minor but persistent advisories—likely consumables or straightforward fixes—that were addressed before the next test. The absence of defects in the latest 2025 entry indicates the car met all roadworthiness standards at over 199,000 miles, a milestone often associated with higher wear in suspension, brakes, or drivetrain components. However, the lack of recorded failures means no red flags have materialised in the past two years, provided the mileage hasn’t been artificially rolled back. The Nemo’s mileage accumulation—16,602 miles per year—is significantly higher than the UK average for its age, reflecting either intensive use or a history of short-term ownership. The gap between the 2023 test (191,263 miles) and the 2024 retests (196,702 miles) covers roughly 5,439 miles in under a year, a pace that would accelerate wear on components like coil springs, suspension bushes, and brake pads. The identical mileage figures for the 2024 and 2025 retests (196,702 and 199,224 miles respectively) suggest the vehicle may have sat unused or been driven minimally between tests, or that the odometer was not advanced between retest attempts. Without advisories or failures, it’s impossible to confirm whether this high mileage has translated into mechanical stress, but the pattern raises questions about how consistently the car has been maintained beyond MOT compliance. Given the clean MOT record, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear areas that aren’t covered by the test, such as the suspension geometry for worn bushes or collapsed coil springs, which often degrade before becoming MOT-critical. The rear brakes, if equipped with drum mechanisms, should be checked for excessive play or uneven wear, as these can fail silently. Exhaust emissions may also warrant scrutiny, given the age and mileage, though the lack of defects suggests no major leaks or catalytic converter issues at the time of testing. Structural corrosion, particularly around wheel arches or sills, should be examined closely, as the Nemo’s lightweight construction can mask early rust until it compromises integrity. Finally, while the MOT history is reassuring, the repeated retests imply some underlying minor issues were present—likely advisories—that were addressed. Verifying whether these were recurring problems (e.g., brake binding, minor leaks) or one-off items would help gauge the car’s long-term reliability.