Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid

2002 Rover 75 2.5L Petrol · BD02 FPJ

BD02 FPJ

2002 Rover 75 (2.5L, petrol). First registered 26/06/2002. Recorded mileage 84,897 miles. MOT valid until 22/02/2027.

Make & Model
ROVER 75
Year / Origin
2002 · Birmingham
MOT Status
Valid until 22/02/2027
Road Tax
Recorded Mileage
84,897 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 2.5L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 22/02/2027
Tax Status
Checking...
Checking DVLA database...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2002
Engine
2497cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The 2026‑02‑23 MOT at 84,897 miles passed, showing that the vehicle currently satisfies DVSA roadworthiness criteria, yet the immediately preceding 2026‑02‑10 test at 84,835 miles recorded a failure for a fractured near‑side rear coil spring, excessive sill corrosion and binding rear brakes, indicating that the recent pass follows a repair of serious structural and brake defects. With a recorded mileage of 84,897 miles and a manufacturing year of 2002, the vehicle averages just over 3,500 miles per year, a figure that is low for its age and points to long periods of inactivity. Mileage increments are modest: from the 2018 test at 63,779 miles to the 2020 test at 64,769 miles only 990 miles elapsed in two years, and the jump to the 2026 test represents roughly 20,000 miles over six years, consistent with intermittent use rather than continuous high‑rate wear. Recurring observations of corroded suspension arms, deteriorated coil springs, and compromised sill and mounting‑point rust suggest that structural integrity should be the primary focus of a physical inspection. The history also shows repeated brake‑pipe corrosion, binding rear brakes, and worn track‑rod ends, all of which merit close examination of the braking system, suspension bushes and arms, and the condition of the chassis rails. A buyer should therefore verify the soundness of the rear coil spring and surrounding suspension components, inspect the sill and mounting areas for fresh corrosion or repair patches, test the brake system for pipe integrity, pad wear and proper binding, and check steering linkage for play, while also confirming that any previous remedial work has been carried out to a satisfactory standard.

BD02 FPJ Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 23/02/2026
  • 84,897 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 1 defect noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring brakes items (8 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
70
/ 100 · Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for BD02FPJ

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

Reliability & Known Issues

Known faults for Rover Rover 75

Our database tracks 4 specific mechanical faults and recurring failure patterns identified across UK MOT testing stations for this generation.

BD02 FPJ Mileage History

  1. 19/01/202471,939 mi
  2. 05/02/202580,026 mi+8,087 mi
  3. 21/02/202580,040 mi+14 mi
  4. 10/02/202684,835 mi+4,795 mi
  5. 23/02/202684,897 mi+62 mi

Average of roughly 6,179 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

BD02 FPJ MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 29 Jul 2026, 08:04
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2002 Rover 75 (BD02 FPJ) between January 2024 and February 2026.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 23 February 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (8 issues), Lighting (5 issues), Tyres (4 issues), Suspension (4 issues), Steering (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 17 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural ”; “Nearside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))”; “Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY