2014 Fiat Panda 1.2L Petrol · BN63 VCD

The Fiat Panda in question has demonstrated a stable but irregular maintenance pattern, with the most recent MOT test on 21 January 2026 resulting in a pass at just 9,709 miles. The absence of recorded defects across all tests—including two consecutive failures in January 2026 and January 2025—suggests either a flaw in the testing process or that any issues were resolved between tests without formal documentation. The repeated failures at identical mileages (9,616 and 9,709) are unusual, as they imply either a temporary administrative error or a persistent but undocumented mechanical issue that cleared itself before the next test. Buyers should treat this as a red flag, as recurring MOT failures without explanation often indicate either a lack of thorough servicing or a vehicle prone to intermittent faults. The recorded mileage of 9,709 miles at the latest test is exceptionally low for a 2014 vehicle, averaging just 809 miles per year over its lifetime. This suggests prolonged periods of inactivity, which can accelerate degradation of rubber components like suspension bushes, wiper blades, and seals, as well as increase the risk of corrosion in areas exposed to moisture. The gap between tests—consistently spaced at one year intervals—does not reflect typical usage patterns, and the lack of mileage progression between 2024 (9,440 miles) and 2025 (9,631 miles) raises questions about whether the vehicle was actively driven or stored. Such low mileage combined with repeated MOT failures warrants closer scrutiny of components that degrade over time regardless of usage. Given the lack of specific defect details in the MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an inspection of suspension components—particularly the bushes and coil springs—for dry rot or excessive wear, as these are common issues in lightly used but aged vehicles. The repeated failures at identical mileages hint at potential brake-related concerns, such as binding calipers or unevenly worn discs, which may not have been fully addressed between tests. Structural integrity should also be assessed, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the underbody, where corrosion could compromise safety without being immediately obvious. Finally, the electrical system—often a source of intermittent failures—should be tested for consistent functionality, as undocumented faults in wiring or sensors could explain the inconsistent pass/fail outcomes.