2017 Peugeot Partner 1.6L Diesel · CE17 ACO

The 2017 Peugeot Partner’s most recent MOT test on 2025-02-21—just 17 months ago—shows no defects recorded despite two consecutive tests at the same mileage (134,735), which is unusual and suggests either a flaw in the test process or a vehicle that has passed without critical issues being detected. The absence of advisories or recurring faults in the last three tests (2023-12-13, 2022-12-09) implies the vehicle has not experienced major mechanical or structural failures, though the double test at identical mileage warrants scrutiny. No evidence of worsening conditions is visible in the record, but the lack of advisories could also indicate basic checks were overlooked by previous owners. The recorded mileage of 134,735 miles over nine years—approximately 14,971 miles annually—is unusually high for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either intensive use or inconsistent servicing. The gap between tests is consistent at one year, but the sudden jump from 100,951 to 114,071 miles (a 13,120-mile increase in just under a year) between 2022 and 2023 hints at a period of heavier usage. Without service records, it’s impossible to confirm whether this mileage was managed responsibly, but the lack of advisories in recent tests suggests no immediate structural or drivetrain concerns—though wear on suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake components would be expected at this mileage. Given the high mileage and the vehicle’s age, a buyer should prioritise an inspection of the suspension system, particularly the condition of the rear bushes and coil springs, which are prone to degradation at this stage. The brakes, including caliper binding and disc thickness, should be checked for uneven wear or corrosion, especially if the vehicle has been driven in wet or salted conditions. Structural integrity, particularly around the wheel arches and sills, should be examined for corrosion, as rust can compromise the frame over time. The double MOT test at the same mileage in 2025 is noteworthy—if no defects were found, this may indicate the tester overlooked critical issues, so a thorough independent check is essential.