2015 Ford B-MAX 1.6L Diesel · CK15 BHX

The 2015 Ford B-Max has demonstrated consistent roadworthiness over its MOT history, with the most recent test on 30 June 2025—just over a year ago—confirming no defects and a clean pass at 87,703 miles. There is no evidence of recurring or escalating issues, as every test since 2022 has recorded a pass without advisories or failures, suggesting the vehicle has been maintained at a basic level without significant mechanical neglect. The absence of advisory notes in any test implies no hidden or deferred problems were identified by the tester, though this does not preclude wear beyond MOT thresholds. The pattern is stable, with no indication of worsening conditions in suspension, brakes, or structural integrity. Mileage progression shows a steady accumulation of approximately 7,973 miles annually, which aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age. There are no unusual gaps or spikes in mileage between tests—each annual interval reflects consistent driving rather than prolonged storage or rapid depreciation. The near-identical mileage at the 2022 test dates (60,814 and 60,817) suggests either a retest or a brief period of minimal use, but this does not raise concern. Overall, the mileage record supports a vehicle that has been driven regularly without extreme wear patterns. Given the lack of failures or advisories, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear components not directly tested under MOT standards. Focus on the suspension, particularly the condition of coil springs, bushes, and dampers, as these are critical for handling and safety but not always flagged in MOTs. The brakes should be examined for uneven wear, binding calipers, or corrosion on the rear discs—common issues in older vehicles that may not always surface in a pass. Additionally, check for structural corrosion, especially around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as this can compromise the vehicle’s integrity over time. Tyre condition, while not reflected in the MOT history, warrants verification, as failing twice on tread depth in prior models suggests basic upkeep may have been inconsistent.