2011 Mazda MX-5 2.0L Petrol · CP11 OFO
2011 Mazda MX-5 (2.0L, petrol). First registered 01/06/2011. Recorded mileage 24,763 miles. MOT valid until 05/05/2027. Taxed until 01/05/2027.
- Make & Model
- MAZDA MX-5
- Year / Origin
- 2011 · Swansea
- Safety Recall
- Unknown
- MOT Status
- Valid until 05/05/2027
- Road Tax
- Taxed (01/05/2027)
- Recorded Mileage
- 24,763 mi
- ULEZ Compliance
- ULEZ Compliant (Euro 4+)
- Fuel & Engine
- PETROL · 2.0L
- Reliability Guide
- Common Faults
- Fuel Type
- PETROL
- Year
- 2011
- Engine
- 1999cc
AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.
CP11 OFO Key Findings
- 5 MOT tests recorded
- Latest MOT passed on 30/04/2026
- 24,763 miles recorded at latest MOT
- 2 historical MOT failures
- No defects recorded at the latest MOT
Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.
MOT Roadworthiness: Good
This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.
Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.
Technical Specifications
Core Specifications
Identification & Status
Dimensions & Weights
Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence
Estimate current market value
Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.
CP11 OFO Mileage History
- 21/11/202318,872 mi
- 21/11/202318,872 mi
- 07/05/202519,317 mi+445 mi
- 07/05/202519,317 mi
- 30/04/202624,763 mi+5,446 mi
Average of roughly 2,414 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.
CP11 OFO MOT History
Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.
5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2011 Mazda Mx-5 (CP11 OFO) between November 2023 and April 2026.
The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.
The most recent test on 30 April 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.
Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Lighting (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.
In total 4 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.
Recorded failure items include: “Front Electronic stability control warning lamp indicates a fault (7.12 (e))”; “Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))”; “Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))”.
Buyer's Guide & Inspection Advisory
Expert automotive synthesis from historical MOT defect records and market benchmarks.
Our Verdict
This low-mileage 2011 Mazda MX-5 with a
Given the very low annual mileage of this MX-5, it is worth asking why the car has been used so sparingly — long periods of inactivity can lead to issues with seals, brakes seizing, and fluid degradation, even when mileage is low. The 2023 MOT failure flagged worn anti-roll bar D-bushes and deteriorated ball joint dust covers on both rear sides; while these were not dangerous enough to fail the test on their own, they suggest the rear suspension may now be due for renewal, so inspect those components carefully and budget for replacement bushes. The 2025 failure related to an ESC warning lamp, which could stem from a faulty wheel speed sensor, a steering angle sensor issue, or simply a bulb/connector fault — ask for evidence of the repair and ideally a diagnostic printout showing the fault has been cleared.
The 2.0-litre MX-5 is the more desirable variant, offering stronger performance than the 1.8-litre equivalent, but it is also more susceptible to clutch wear if driven enthusiastically. With 24,763 miles on the clock, the original clutch may well be worn, so test it carefully on a test drive for any juddering or slipping. Check for any history of bodywork repairs, as MX-5s of this age can suffer from rust around the rear bulkhead and wheel arches, particularly if the car has been used year-round. A full service history with Mazda or a specialist will significantly boost confidence in this example.
Negotiation should focus on the cost of addressing the anti-roll bar components flagged in 2023, the unknown cause of the 2025 ESC warning, and any potential clutch replacement. Even if the car drives perfectly, budgeting £400-£800 for preventive suspension work is prudent given the documented advisories.
Fuel economy for the 2.0-litre Mazda MX-5 typically sits in the 35-40 mpg range for mixed driving, dropping to around 28-32 mpg during enthusiastic use. Road tax for a 2011 2.0-litre petrol MX-5 is £290 per year, as vehicles registered between 2001 and 2011 with engines over 1,550cc sit in the higher bracket. Insurance is relatively affordable thanks to the MX-5's sporty but modest image — this 2.0-litre variant typically falls into insurance group 26, costing roughly £350-£500 annually for a typical UK driver. Routine servicing through a Mazda specialist costs around £200-£300 per visit, with major items such as cambelt replacement (if applicable to this engine), brake fluid, and coolant flushes adding occasional expense.
Allow roughly £400-£600 per year for maintenance on top of fuel, tax, and insurance, depending on whether you use a main dealer or independent specialist. Tyres are a known cost on MX-5s as the rear wheels wear faster than the fronts; a set of quality tyres costs around £250-£350 fitted. Given the low mileage on this example, the car should be relatively economical to run provided no major work is required.
Begin with the rear suspension components flagged in the 2023 MOT — physically inspect both rear anti-roll bar D-bushes for cracking, splitting, or excessive movement, and check the ball joint dust covers for splits or contamination. The 2025 ESC warning lamp failure should be investigated by reading any stored fault codes via a diagnostic tool, as intermittent ESC faults can indicate wheel bearing wear, ABS sensor issues, or steering angle sensor calibration problems. Lift the car and check for any play in the rear wheel bearings, as MX-5s of this age are known to develop bearing wear.
Inspect the rear bulkhead, sills, and wheel arches thoroughly for rust — this is the most common corrosion point on Mk3 MX-5s, particularly on cars kept outdoors year-round. Examine the soft-top or hard-top seals for condition, as perished seals cause water ingress into the boot and can lead to electrical issues. Check the under-bonnet area for any signs of fluid leaks, paying particular attention to the cam cover gasket, which can weep oil on higher-mileage examples.
On the test drive, verify the operation of the gearbox, which should feel precise and not notchy, and confirm that the clutch engages smoothly without slipping or juddering. Test the ABS and stability control systems by performing a few gentle stops to ensure the warning lights extinguish correctly after start-up. Finally, confirm that the 2025 ESC warning has been properly resolved by checking whether the light remains off during ignition and while driving.
This silver CP11OFO Mazda MX-5 was first registered in June 2011 and has covered only 24,763 miles across 15 years, averaging roughly 1,650 miles per year — well below the Mazda MX-5 model average of 3,053 annual miles. The MOT record shows two passes and two failures, with the most recent test on 30 April 2026 recording no defects at all. The earlier failures relate to anti-roll bar components and an electronic stability control warning lamp, all of which are documented and identifiable concerns rather than structural problems.
The Mazda MX-5 has a strong enthusiast reputation for mechanical simplicity and longevity, reflected in its 81.6% MOT pass rate across 108,807 analysed vehicles. The most common MOT failure reasons across the model are exhaust issues, corrosion, and headlamp defects, none of which have been recorded on this particular example.
Reviewed by the IsItAGoodCar editorial team — Verified automotive analysis synthesized from official vehicle registries.
Data Sources
DVSA
Official MOT test logs & failure reasons
DVLA
Tax, registration & powertrain specs
Experian
Finance, stolen markers & total loss
AI Analysis
Historical fault & advisory patterns
Similar Vehicles
Similar Vehicles Checked Recently
Plate Neighbors
Batch Registration Neighbors (CP11 Series)
Vehicles registered in the same regional DVLA batch as CP11OFO.
YAMAHA
YBR125
SUZUKI
GSR 750 L1
YAMAHA
XC125
YAMAHA
YBR 125
SUZUKI
GSR 750 L1
SUZUKI
DL 650 L0
YAMAHA
YBR125
FORD
FOCUS
FORD
FOCUS
FORD
FOCUS
FORD
FIESTA
FORD
FIESTA