Official DVLA Record
Check Service Records

2013 Land Rover Defender 2.2L Diesel · CP63 FTV

CP63 FTV

2013 Land Rover Defender (2.2L, diesel). First registered 19/09/2013. Recorded mileage 55,349 miles. MOT status: Expired. Currently declared SORN.

Make & Model
LAND ROVER DEFENDER
Year / Origin
2013 · Swansea
MOT Status
Valid until 17/11/2024
Road Tax
SORN
Recorded Mileage
55,349 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Non-Compliant (Pre-Euro 6 Diesel)
Fuel & Engine
Diesel · 2.2L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Expired
Valid until 17/11/2024
Tax Status
SORN
Statutory Off Road (SORN)
Fuel Type
Diesel
Year
2013
Engine
2198cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The most recent MOT test on the 2013 Land Rover Defender, conducted in April 2025, resulted in a failure with multiple serious defects, including a non-compliant front registration plate, an ineffective front windscreen wiper, and critical corrosion on the offside rear brake pipe. Additionally, there was a dangerous condition of the rear brake disc, which was deemed seriously weakened, and a significantly reduced intensity of the offside rear fog lamp. This failure contrasts sharply with the preceding MOTs, which were passed with only minor advisories related to worn shock absorber bushes on both rear lower arms. The pattern suggests that while the vehicle has maintained a relatively stable condition in terms of minor mechanical wear, the recent test highlights a sudden escalation in more severe issues, particularly concerning structural integrity and braking system reliability. The presence of a dangerous failure on the brake disc—particularly when coupled with corrosion on the adjacent brake pipe—demonstrates that the vehicle has either undergone significant stress or has been neglected in critical areas. This abrupt deterioration warrants immediate attention, as such failures often indicate underlying problems that could compromise safety if left unresolved. The recorded mileage of 55,349 miles for a vehicle aged 13 years represents an unusually low annual usage rate of approximately 4,258 miles per year. This is far below the typical wear rates expected for a robust off-road vehicle of its class, which often accumulate between 8,000 to 12,000 miles annually under normal conditions. The disparity between the mileage and age suggests that the vehicle has either been stored for extended periods, driven primarily in low-demand scenarios, or has been subject to deliberate underuse. However, low mileage alone does not negate the risk of wear from prolonged static conditions, such as corrosion from standing fluids, standing corrosion on metal components, and degradation of seals and gaskets due to lack of movement. Additionally, the suspension and drivetrain components, which have been flagged with minor advisories for worn shock absorber bushes, may have been exposed to excessive stress if the vehicle has been subjected to rough terrain or heavy loads while stationary. The absence of recent service records or a service booklet further complicates the assessment, as it leaves open the possibility of deferred maintenance or hidden wear from infrequent but potentially harsh usage. Given the recent MOT failure and the critical nature of the defects identified, the prospective buyer must prioritise a thorough mechanical inspection before proceeding with purchase. The dangerous condition of the rear brake disc, which has been weakened to the point of posing a safety risk, necessitates immediate attention. This failure is typically associated with excessive heat, warping, or structural compromise, often caused by prolonged braking, uneven wear, or underlying issues such as binding calipers or worn brake pads. During a test drive, listen for abnormal brake pulsation or shuddering, which may indicate warped discs or uneven friction material wear. Additionally, check for brake fluid leaks around the brake master cylinder and caliper seals, as well as any unusual brake pedal travel or sponginess, which could signal hydraulic system issues. The corrosion on the offside rear brake pipe should also be addressed promptly, as further deterioration could lead to brake line failure or fluid leakage, compromising braking performance. The front windscreen wiper failure and registration plate non-compliance are less critical but must be rectified to meet legal requirements, with the wiper blades requiring replacement to ensure effective windscreen clearance during adverse weather. For the buyer, the next step is to conduct a comprehensive physical inspection of the vehicle’s structural and fluid systems, given its age and the history of minor but recurring suspension issues. Focus on the rear suspension arms, particularly the lower arms where the worn shock absorber bushes were noted, as these are critical to load distribution and handling stability. Inspect for excessive play or clunking noises when the vehicle is driven over bumps or at speed, which may indicate further bush wear or suspension component failure. The suspension coils should be checked for signs of damage or compression, and the control arms should be examined for signs of rust or excessive wear. Given the low mileage, the buyer should also verify the condition of the tyres, paying particular attention to sidewall perishing or cracking, which can weaken the tyre structure and reduce safety. The 12V battery should be tested for charge retention and overall health, as prolonged static conditions can lead to sulphation or failure. Additionally, the vehicle’s fluid levels—particularly brake fluid, coolant, and transmission fluid—should be checked for freshness and contamination, as fluids degrade over time regardless of mileage. If the buyer is unable to obtain a service history, they should request a full service log from the seller to confirm the vehicle has been maintained according to manufacturer recommendations, especially for critical items such as the suspension, brakes, and exhaust system. Finally, the buyer should consider a professional pre-purchase inspection by a qualified Land Rover specialist to assess the extent of the recent MOT failures and any hidden issues that may have arisen from the vehicle’s unusual usage profile.

CP63 FTV Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT failed on 15/04/2025
  • 55,349 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 8 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring suspension items (8 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
25
/ 100 · Poor
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Poor

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
✗ 2 dangerous defects found recently
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for CP63FTV

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Direct Manufacturer Service History

Digital Service History

Access verified franchised dealer maintenance records for CP63FTV.

Official OE Dealer Records

Unlock Manufacturer Digital Service Records

Check franchised dealer maintenance history for CP63FTV. Our direct integration verifies routine service events, workshop operations, recorded mileage, and technician logs.

Official dealer maintenance records
Logged mileage at every workshop visit
Itemised repairer operations & schedules
Official VIN identification verification
Included in Extended Check Bundle discount

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

CP63 FTV Mileage History

  1. 28/10/202146,450 mi
  2. 18/11/202251,380 mi+4,930 mi
  3. 18/11/202251,380 mi
  4. 17/11/202354,047 mi+2,667 mi
  5. 15/04/202555,349 mi+1,302 mi

Average of roughly 2,569 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

CP63 FTV MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 19 Sept 2026, 09:24
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2013 Land Rover Defender (CP63 FTV) between October 2021 and April 2025.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 15 April 2025 was a fail; the vehicle has not passed its last recorded MOT.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Suspension (8 issues), Windscreen (4 issues), Lighting (3 issues), Brakes (3 issues), Steering (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 9 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Front Brake pipe at imminent risk of failure or fracture Both sides marked with yellow chalk rubbing spring cups (1.1.11”; “Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Wrong headlamps fitted to vehicle (4.1.2 (c))”; “Rear Rear fog lamp light intensity significantly reduced (4.5.4 (a))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY