2020 SEAT Leon 1.5L Petrol · CP69 AAV

The most recent MOT history for this SEAT Leon reveals a concerning pattern of inconsistency rather than a stable roadworthiness trend. The vehicle failed twice in December 2025—both tests conducted on the same day at 29,010 miles—despite no defects being recorded. This duplication suggests either an administrative error or a deliberate retest after a minor oversight, but it does not reflect genuine mechanical issues. The preceding MOT in December 2024 passed cleanly at 22,717 miles, indicating no recurring faults were detected over the intervening period. However, the double failure in late 2025—without explanation—raises questions about whether the vehicle was driven immediately before testing or if there was a last-minute service. The lack of advisories or defects in any test implies no major components were at risk of imminent failure, though the retest itself is unusual and warrants scrutiny. The recorded mileage of 29,010 miles over five years (2020–2025) averages just under 4,800 miles annually, which is unusually low for a vehicle of this age. The gaps between tests are consistent at roughly 12 months, but the stagnant mileage suggests prolonged periods of inactivity rather than regular use. The jump from 17,664 to 22,717 miles between December 2023 and December 2024 (5,053 miles in a year) contrasts sharply with the near-zero mileage increase between December 2024 and December 2025 (just 6,293 miles over 12 months, though the retest complicates this). Such low mileage could mean the car was stored for extended periods, potentially accelerating wear on fluids, seals, and suspension components due to lack of movement. Alternatively, it may indicate the vehicle was used sparingly, but this pattern should prompt verification of whether critical services—such as brake fluid changes, coolant flushes, or suspension lubrication—were performed during these inactive periods. Given the absence of recorded defects or advisories, the most pressing in-person inspections should focus on components that degrade passively when a vehicle is stationary for long periods. Verify the condition of brake fluid for moisture contamination, as prolonged storage can lead to corrosion in the brake system. Check for corrosion at wheel arches, sills, and underbody, particularly around the suspension mounts and exhaust system, as rust can develop even with low mileage if the car was exposed to moisture. The suspension bushes and coil springs should be examined for cracking or perishing, as these are prone to deterioration from age and inactivity. Additionally, inspect the tyre tread depth and uniformity, as the double MOT failure—despite no recorded defects—could hint at a last-minute tyre pressure adjustment or minor tread wear that was overlooked. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are flawless, so a thorough visual and functional assessment is essential.